Mulroy Michael F
Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98111, USA.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Dec;15(6):641-5. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200212000-00007.
This review will bring to the reader's attention recent developments in the literature regarding regional anesthesia in the outpatient setting, and allow the reader to evaluate whether these developments are appropriate for inclusion in clinical practice.
The most stimulating developments in the area of regional anesthesia for outpatients revolve around the use of continuous analgesic therapy for outpatients after discharge. This is reflected in recent publications describing the use of continuous catheters for peripheral nerve blockade using portable pumps to provide 48-72 h of postoperative analgesia. These devices have raised the hope of opioid-free pain relief for virtually the entire duration of postsurgical pain in the outpatient setting. There are also increasing numbers of suggestions on ways to improve the quality of spinal anesthesia in the outpatient setting, particularly by using lower doses of lidocaine to reduce the problem of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal blockade. Several authors have investigated the cost implications of regional techniques in the outpatient setting, and have concluded that they are very competitive with the general anesthetic techniques that are frequently employed.
Recent publications suggest additional ways to add regional anesthesia techniques to outpatient surgical practice, particularly with the promise of extensive postoperative pain relief for the ambulatory surgery patient.
本综述将使读者关注门诊区域麻醉领域的最新文献进展,并让读者评估这些进展是否适用于临床实践。
门诊区域麻醉领域最令人兴奋的进展围绕出院后门诊患者的持续镇痛治疗。这在近期的出版物中有所体现,这些文献描述了使用便携式泵通过连续导管进行外周神经阻滞以提供48 - 72小时术后镇痛。这些装置带来了在门诊环境中几乎整个术后疼痛期间实现无阿片类药物镇痛的希望。关于提高门诊脊髓麻醉质量的方法也有越来越多的建议,特别是通过使用较低剂量的利多卡因来减少脊髓阻滞后短暂性神经症状的问题。几位作者研究了门诊区域技术的成本影响,并得出结论,它们与经常使用的全身麻醉技术相比具有很强的竞争力。
近期出版物提出了将区域麻醉技术应用于门诊手术实践的其他方法,特别是有望为门诊手术患者提供广泛的术后疼痛缓解。