Leventhal Adam M, Chasson Gregory S, Tapia Evelina, Miller Elizabeth K, Pettit Jeremy W
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5022, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec;62(12):1545-58. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20327.
The present study evaluated and compared the psychometric properties of three self-report scales: the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; R. P. Snaith, M. Hamilton, S. Morley, & A. Humayan, 1995), Fawcett-Clark Pleasure Capacity Scale (FCPS; J. Fawcett, D. C. Clark, W. A. Scheftner, & R. D. Gibbons, 1983), and the Revised Chapman Physical Anhedonia Scale (CPAS; L. J. Chapman, J. P. Chapman, & M. L. Raulin, 1976). These scales, designed to assess hedonic responsiveness, were administered to 157 college students. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a Hedonic Capacity factor that was largely defined by the SHAPS but also had a substantial loading from the FCPS. Hedonic Capacity was minimally correlated with constructs of Depression and Anxiety, which were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory-II and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The CPAS (anhedonia) was not significantly related to Hedonic Capacity or Anxiety, but it did have a small positive loading on Depression. These findings suggest that further research is needed to clarify the meaning of and relationships among scales that are putative indicators of hedonic capacity and anhedonia.
斯奈斯 - 汉密尔顿愉悦量表（SHAPS；R.P.斯奈斯、M.汉密尔顿、S.莫利和A.胡马扬，1995年）、福西特 - 克拉克愉悦能力量表（FCPS；J.福西特、D.C.克拉克、W.A.谢夫特纳和R.D.吉本斯，1983年）以及修订版查普曼身体快感缺失量表（CPAS；L.J.查普曼、J.P.查普曼和M.L.劳林，1976年）。这些旨在评估享乐反应性的量表被施用于157名大学生。验证性因素分析揭示了一个享乐能力因素，该因素在很大程度上由SHAPS定义，但也有来自FCPS的大量负荷。享乐能力与通过贝克抑郁量表第二版和贝克焦虑量表评估的抑郁和焦虑构念的相关性最小。CPAS（快感缺失）与享乐能力或焦虑没有显著关系，但它在抑郁上有一个小的正向负荷。这些发现表明，需要进一步的研究来阐明作为享乐能力和快感缺失假定指标的量表的含义及其之间的关系。
