Grös Daniel F, Antony Martin M, Simms Leonard J, McCabe Randi E
Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):369-81. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.369.
The State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA; M. J. Ree, C. MacLeod, D. French, & V. Locke, 2000) was designed to assess cognitive and somatic symptoms of anxiety as they pertain to one's mood in the moment (state) and in general (trait). This study extended the previous psychometric findings to a clinical sample and validated the STICSA against a well-published measure of anxiety, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; C. D. Spielberger, 1983). Patients (N=567) at an anxiety disorders clinic were administered a battery of questionnaires. The results of confirmatory factor analyses (Bentler-Bonnett nonnormed fit index, comparative fit index, and Bollen fit index>.90; root-mean-square error of approximation<.05); convergent and discriminant validity analyses; and group comparisons supported the reliability and validity of the STICSA as a measure of state and trait cognitive and somatic anxiety. In addition, compared with the STAI (anxiety: rs</=.52; depression: rs>/=.64), the STICSA was more strongly correlated with another measure of anxiety (rs>/=.67) and was less strongly correlated with a measure of depression (rs</=.61). These findings suggest that the STICSA may be a purer measure of anxiety symptomatology than is the STAI.
认知与躯体焦虑状态-特质量表(STICSA;M. J. 里、C. 麦克劳德、D. 弗伦奇和V. 洛克,2000年)旨在评估焦虑的认知和躯体症状,这些症状与个体当下的情绪(状态)和总体情绪(特质)相关。本研究将先前的心理测量结果扩展至临床样本,并以一份已广泛发表的焦虑测量工具——状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI;C. D. 斯皮尔伯格,1983年)为参照,对STICSA进行了验证。一家焦虑症诊所的患者(N = 567)接受了一系列问卷调查。验证性因素分析结果(本特勒-博内特非标准化拟合指数、比较拟合指数和博伦拟合指数>.90;近似均方根误差<.05);收敛效度和区分效度分析;以及组间比较,均支持了STICSA作为状态和特质认知与躯体焦虑测量工具的信效度。此外,与STAI相比(焦虑:rs</=.52;抑郁:rs>/=.64),STICSA与另一项焦虑测量工具的相关性更强(rs>/=.67),而与一项抑郁测量工具的相关性较弱(rs</=.61)。这些发现表明,与STAI相比,STICSA可能是一种更纯粹的焦虑症状测量工具。