Calam R, Peters S
School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2006;15(3):107-15. doi: 10.1002/mpr.187.
Little is known of the concordance between ratings of expressed emotion (EE) derived from the Camberwell Family Interview (CFI) and Five-minute Speech Sample (FMSS) for parents of children with behaviour problems. Concordance between CFI and FMSS ratings of EE was assessed prior to intervention and compared to parent-rated behaviour after intervention, at follow-up, 12 months later. Female primary caretakers of 75 children (3-10 years) showing behavioural difficulties were interviewed using FMSS and CFI. Interviews were coded independently by criterion-standard raters. Using CFI, 57 families were classified high EE, and 18 low EE. Using FMSS, 65 families were classified high EE and 10 low EE. 55/75 pairs of ratings (73%) were the same (high, n = 51: low, n = 4) and 20 mothers (27%) were allocated different EE status (Kappa = 0.14, n.s.). The FMSS ratings at initial interview appeared more closely related to behaviour rating at follow-up than CFI. Further investigation is required to establish comparability of CFI and FMSS results for carers of children.
对于有行为问题儿童的父母,从坎伯韦尔家庭访谈(CFI)和五分钟言语样本(FMSS)得出的情感表达(EE)评分之间的一致性了解甚少。在干预前评估了CFI和FMSS的EE评分之间的一致性,并与干预后、12个月随访时父母评定的行为进行比较。对75名有行为困难的3至10岁儿童的女性主要照顾者进行了FMSS和CFI访谈。访谈由标准评定者独立编码。使用CFI,57个家庭被归类为高EE,18个家庭为低EE。使用FMSS,65个家庭被归类为高EE,10个家庭为低EE。75对评分中有55对(73%)相同(高EE,n = 51;低EE,n = 4),20位母亲(27%)被分配了不同的EE状态(卡帕 = 0.14,无显著性差异)。初次访谈时的FMSS评分似乎比CFI评分与随访时的行为评分更密切相关。需要进一步调查以确定CFI和FMSS结果对于儿童照顾者的可比性。