Suppr超能文献

英国、荷兰和爱尔兰分子基因检测的监测标准。

Monitoring standards for molecular genetic testing in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Ireland.

作者信息

Ramsden Simon C, Deans Zandra, Robinson David O, Mountford Roger, Sistermans Erik A, Grody Wayne W, McQuaid Shirley, Patton Simon J, Stenhouse Susan A R

机构信息

National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Manchester), St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Genet Test. 2006 Fall;10(3):147-56. doi: 10.1089/gte.2006.10.147.

Abstract

Molecular genetic techniques have entered many areas of clinical practice. Public expectations from this technology are understandably high. To maintain confidence in this technology, laboratories must implement the highest standards of quality assurance (QA). External quality assessment (EQA) is recognized as an essential component of QA. The United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UKNEQAS) for Molecular Genetics, first set up in 1991, is currently the longest provider of EQA to molecular genetic testing laboratories in the UK, The Netherlands, and Ireland. Errors in the scheme are sporadic events. However, evidence from this and other EQA schemes suggests that a residual error rate persists, which should be taken into account in clinical practice. This EQA scheme has evolved from the respective scientific bodies of the constituent countries and retains a strong emphasis on collective peer review. It is essential that the steps taken to ensure quality in this rapidly expanding field are clear and transparent to participants and public alike. We describe the procedures developed and the governance imposed to monitor and improve analytical and reporting standards in participant laboratories and we compare our experiences with those of equivalent EQA services in the United States.

摘要

分子遗传学技术已进入临床实践的许多领域。公众对这项技术的期望很高,这是可以理解的。为了保持对该技术的信心,实验室必须实施最高标准的质量保证(QA)。外部质量评估(EQA)被认为是质量保证的重要组成部分。英国分子遗传学国家外部质量评估服务(UKNEQAS)于1991年首次设立,目前是英国、荷兰和爱尔兰分子遗传学检测实验室最长时间的EQA提供者。该计划中的错误是偶发事件。然而,来自该计划和其他EQA计划的证据表明,残留错误率仍然存在,临床实践中应予以考虑。该EQA计划由各成员国的相关科学机构发展而来,并且仍然非常强调集体同行评审。对于参与者和公众而言,在这个迅速发展的领域中确保质量所采取的步骤清晰透明至关重要。我们描述了所制定的程序以及为监测和提高参与实验室的分析和报告标准而实施的管理措施,并将我们的经验与美国同等EQA服务的经验进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验