Bock M, Bauer M, Rösler L, Sinner B, Motsch J
Abteilung 1 für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Zentralkrankenhaus, Lorenz-Böhler-Strasse 5, 39100 Bozen.
Anaesthesist. 2007 Jan;56(1):63-6, 68-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1099-z.
Forced by the current economical situation, German hospitals have to reconsider their clinical productivity. When caregivers introduce new therapeutic concepts medical quality should either be improved without increasing costs or when reducing costs medical quality should be maintained. In the surgical field postoperative shivering reduces both patient comfort and medical quality. We therefore investigated the clinical pathway prevention of shivering with dolasetron in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled analysis of cost-effectiveness.
After written informed consent we randomized 40 patients scheduled for lumbar disc hernia repair or head and neck surgery into two groups: patients of group D received dolasetron 1 mg/kg body weight during surgery whereas patients of group K received 100 ml saline as placebo. Primary endpoints were the incidence of shivering, the length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit and process-associated costs. Secondary endpoint was the influence on perioperative thermoregulation.
We observed postanesthetic shivering in 5 patients belonging to group D in comparison to 15 patients receiving the placebo (p<0.05). The length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit was shorter in patients allocated to dolasetron (mean+/-SD; group D: 43+/-16 min, group K 62+/-18 min, p<0.05). There was a significant saving in process-associated personnel costs (personnel costs in group D EUR 41.26+/-14, personnel costs in group K EUR 53.15+/-15) but in contrast the process-associated material costs were significantly increased (group D EUR 17.16+/-3, group K EUR 0.73+/-1, p<0.05).
The optimization of the clinical process and medical quality induced by a prophylaxis against shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting compensates for the increased use of pharmaceutical resources in our setting.
受当前经济形势所迫,德国医院不得不重新审视其临床工作效率。当医护人员引入新的治疗理念时,医疗质量要么在不增加成本的情况下得到提高,要么在降低成本的同时保持医疗质量。在外科领域,术后寒战会降低患者舒适度和医疗质量。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照的成本效益分析,以研究使用多潘立酮预防寒战的临床路径。
在获得书面知情同意后,我们将40例计划进行腰椎间盘突出症修复术或头颈手术的患者随机分为两组:D组患者在手术期间接受1mg/kg体重的多潘立酮,而K组患者接受100ml生理盐水作为安慰剂。主要终点是寒战发生率、麻醉后护理单元的住院时间和与过程相关的成本。次要终点是对围手术期体温调节的影响。
我们观察到D组有5例患者出现麻醉后寒战,而接受安慰剂的患者中有15例出现寒战(p<0.05)。使用多潘立酮的患者在麻醉后护理单元的住院时间较短(平均值±标准差;D组:43±16分钟,K组62±18分钟,p<0.05)。与过程相关的人员成本有显著节省(D组人员成本为41.26±14欧元,K组人员成本为53.15±15欧元),但相比之下,与过程相关的材料成本显著增加(D组为17.16±3欧元,K组为0.73±1欧元,p<0.05)。
在我们的研究中,预防寒战及术后恶心呕吐所带来的临床过程和医疗质量的优化,弥补了药物资源使用增加的情况。