Van der Stigchel Stefan, Meeter Martijn, Theeuwes Jan
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Van Der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Jul;125(3):279-90. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
We tested a recent hypothesis suggesting that the eye deviates away from a location when top-down preparation can influence target selection. Participants had to make an eye movement to a peripheral target. Before the upcoming target, a central cue indicated the likely target location. Results show that when the target was presented at a location different from that indicated by the cue, eye movements to the target deviated away from the cued location. Because central cues are under top-down control, the present results are in line with a determining role of top-down preparation on saccade direction. These results contrast with the findings reported in a similar paradigm executed with hand movements, in which the movements were mostly initiated in the direction of the cued location. Therefore, we conclude that inhibitory effects typically observed when executing eye movements may not be observed when executing hand movements in similar conditions.
我们对最近的一个假设进行了测试,该假设认为当自上而下的准备能够影响目标选择时,眼睛会偏离某个位置。参与者必须向一个周边目标进行眼动。在即将出现的目标之前,一个中央线索会指示可能的目标位置。结果显示,当目标出现在与线索所指示的位置不同的地方时,向目标的眼动会偏离线索所指示的位置。由于中央线索受自上而下的控制,目前的结果与自上而下的准备对扫视方向的决定性作用是一致的。这些结果与在类似范式中执行手部动作时所报告的结果形成对比,在手部动作中,动作大多朝着线索所指示的位置开始。因此,我们得出结论,在类似条件下执行眼动时通常观察到的抑制作用,在执行手部动作时可能不会出现。