van Ooijen P M A, Roosjen R, de Blecourt M J, van Dam R, Broekema A, Oudkerk M
Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, P. O. Box 3001, 9700RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Digit Imaging. 2006;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):72-7. doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-0932-x.
Patient data are increasingly distributed between hospitals using CD-ROMs instead of actual films. This introduces problems because different viewers from different vendors are provided, and sometimes viewers are unusable because local software installation is not allowed. In 2004, we started to facilitate the incorporation of CD-ROM data into the normal workflow of the hospital by using commercially available software to perform patient reconciliation based on the DICOM (digital imaging and communication in medicine) modality worklist. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate this new procedure.
A questionnaire was sent to all users to evaluate the satisfaction with the current facility and to evaluate possible improvements. Several quality parameters on speed and satisfaction were rated on a 5-point scale (1 = bad to 5 = excellent).
Replies from 17 different respondents were evaluated, accounting for an average of 76 CD-ROMs per week. Mean (median) results showed a score of 3.6 (4) for handling time, 3.4 (4) for archival of second opinion data, 3.8 (median 4) for archival of external data onto the web server, and 4.5 (median 5) for the overall performance of the current procedure.
Although some improvements can be made, storage of the study data from CDs from outpatients into PACS (picture archiving and communication system) and web server already provides for an existing need. Using this service, physicians can access the data with ease and familiarity. User satisfaction with the provided solution is high.
患者数据越来越多地通过光盘在医院之间分发,而非实际的胶片。这带来了一些问题,因为提供了来自不同供应商的不同阅片软件,而且有时由于不允许进行本地软件安装,这些软件无法使用。2004年,我们开始通过使用商用软件基于DICOM(医学数字成像和通信)模态工作列表来进行患者核对,从而促进将光盘数据纳入医院的正常工作流程。本研究的目的是评估这一新流程。
向所有用户发送了一份问卷,以评估对当前设施的满意度并评估可能的改进之处。对速度和满意度的几个质量参数采用5分制评分(1 = 差至5 = 优)。
对17位不同受访者的回复进行了评估,平均每周处理76张光盘。平均(中位数)结果显示,处理时间得分为3.6(4),二次诊断数据存档得分为3.4(4),将外部数据存档到网络服务器得分为3.8(中位数4),当前流程的整体表现得分为4.5(中位数5)。
尽管仍有一些可以改进的地方,但将门诊患者光盘中的研究数据存储到PACS(图像存档与通信系统)和网络服务器中已经满足了现有需求。通过使用这项服务,医生可以轻松且熟悉地访问数据。用户对所提供解决方案的满意度很高。