Suppr超能文献

门诊骨科环境中数字成像研究的评估

An Evaluation of Digital Imaging Studies in an Outpatient Orthopedic Setting.

作者信息

Lutsky Kevin, Leinberry Charles, Gallant Greg, Takei Robert, Kwok Moody, Beredjiklian Pedro

机构信息

The Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Research performed at Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2019 May;7(3):235-238.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distribution of radiographic images in the outpatient setting on compact discs-recordable (CD-R) is commonplace. Opening, manipulating and interpreting these can be challenging. This study evaluated the availability and ease of use of CD-R to evaluate digital images in an outpatient orthopedic setting.

METHODS

118 CD-R containing diagnostic studies were evaluated by seven board certified orthopaedic surgeons. Surgeon age and self-perceived "tech savvy" scores were tabulated using a visual analog scale (VAS). Surgeons evaluated: ability and number of computers to open, autorun, and specific reader software. Time to load was recorded in seconds, type of study, presence of "not for diagnostic use", and if the disc required additional software. Studies were graded using a VAS for ease of opening, ability to move from image to image and/or between series, to manipulate the image, and to zoom and pan.

RESULTS

There were 79 radiographs, 29 MRI's, and 10 CT scans. Seven (6%) had to be manually opened and four (3%) required software installation. Thirteen (11%) contained a warning that the studies should not be used for diagnostic purposes. Six (5%) of the studies could not be opened. For the opened studies, average time from disk insertion to image was 43.7 seconds overall (range 3-350), 65.3 seconds (range 21-191) for MRI and CT, and 35.2 seconds (range 5-177) for radiographs.

CONCLUSION

The present digital imaging systems include different software types and a variety of interfaces. Improving this would decrease time and effort necessary to open and evaluate these studies, and improve efficiency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

在门诊环境中,使用可记录光盘(CD-R)分发放射影像很常见。打开、操作和解读这些影像可能具有挑战性。本研究评估了在门诊骨科环境中使用CD-R评估数字影像的可用性和易用性。

方法

七名获得委员会认证的骨科外科医生对118张包含诊断研究的CD-R进行了评估。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录外科医生的年龄和自我感知的“技术熟练程度”分数。外科医生评估了:打开、自动运行和特定阅读器软件的计算机能力和数量。加载时间以秒为单位记录,记录研究类型、是否存在“非诊断用途”说明,以及光盘是否需要额外软件。使用VAS对研究进行分级,评估其打开的难易程度、在图像之间和/或系列之间移动、操作图像以及缩放和平移的能力。

结果

有79张X光片、29份磁共振成像(MRI)和10份计算机断层扫描(CT)。七张(6%)必须手动打开,四张(3%)需要安装软件。十三张(11%)包含研究不应出于诊断目的使用的警告。六项(5%)研究无法打开。对于已打开的研究,从插入光盘到显示图像的平均总时间为43.7秒(范围为3 - 350秒),MRI和CT为65.3秒(范围为21 - 191秒),X光片为35.2秒(范围为5 - 177秒)。

结论

当前的数字成像系统包括不同的软件类型和各种接口。改进这一点将减少打开和评估这些研究所需的时间和精力,并提高效率。

证据级别

III级。

相似文献

2
Compromise of Radiology Studies From Nonstandardized Viewing Platforms.来自非标准化阅片平台的放射学研究的折衷情况。
Orthopedics. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):e136-e141. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20171213-03. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
6
Digital imaging analysis of scar aesthetics.瘢痕美学的数字成像分析。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Mar;25(3):119-23. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000412907.43335.a2.

本文引用的文献

5
Time allocation in primary care office visits.基层医疗门诊就诊的时间分配
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1871-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验