Liang J-T, Lai H-S, Lee P-H
Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, No.7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1772-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0665-9.
The laparoscopic approach for the treatment of sigmoid volvulus has been a rare surgical indication. This phase 2 study investigated the feasibility and surgical outcomes of elective laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus.
Patients with sigmoid volvulus were first offered colonoscopic decompression for their acute colonic obstruction. If the colonic decompression was successful, complete bowel preparation was performed, followed by elective laparoscopically assisted sigmoidectomy. The details of the laparoscopic procedures are shown in the video. Briefly, the redundant sigmoid colon is totally mobilized by a laparoscopic medial-to-lateral dissection sequence, after which it is exteriorized, transected, and reconstructed by end-to-end anastomosis. In the authors' experience, the medial-to-lateral approach is highly efficient for the laparoscopic mobilization of the redundant sigmoid colon. We believe that the longer the lateral abdominal wall attachment of the sigmoid colon is preserved, the better the exposure and the easier the dissection. If the risk of anastomotic leakage is considered high in a specific case, protective ileostomy is selectively preformed. Before entering the current study, the patients were well informed about the advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery. The enrollment of patients was selective according to the appropriate eligibility criteria. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital. The patients' clinicopathologic data and surgical outcomes were prospectively evaluated.
Between August 2001 and April, 2005, a total of 14 patients (10 men and 4 women) with sigmoid volvulus were treated with the described procedure. The age distribution of the patients was 68.4 +/- 12.2 years. The attack of sigmoid volvulus was the first episode for eight patients, the second episode for 4 patients, and the third episode (or more) for two patients. The body mass index (BMI) of the patients was 26.8 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2). The physical status (classification of American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA]) was 1 for five patients, 2 for eight patients, and 3 for 1 patient. During the laparoscopy, all the patients presented with the pathognomonic findings of sigmoid volvulus including redundant sigmoid colon, narrow sigmoid mesenteric pedicle, and mesosigmoiditis with mesenteric fibrosis and scarring, as shown in the video. The length of the resected colon was 32 +/- 6 cm. The operation time was 194.6 +/- 32.4 min, and the blood loss was 44.0 +/- 12.4 ml. The abdominal wound consisted of four 5 to 12 mm working ports and a 5 cm major wound for exteriorization of the sigmoid colon. Some surgeons have shown that a sigmoid volvulus can be resected through a 5-cm left lower quadrant incision with very little mobilization of the colon because of its redundancy. In this context, the laparoscopic approach competed with the minilaparotomy method in terms of adequate sigmoid resection, lysis of mesosigmoid adhesion, and tension-free colorectal anastomosis. Protective ileostomy was performed for the only patient with a physical status of ASA 3. There was no mortality in this case series. However, pneumonia developed postoperatively in one patient, acute myocardial infarction in one patient, and wound infection in two patients. Excluding the two patients who experienced postoperative pneumonia and acute myocardial infarction, the duration of the postoperative ileus was 48 +/- 12 h, the postoperative hospitalization was 7 +/- 1 days, and the degree of postoperative pain was 3.5 +/- 0.5 according to the visual analog scale. The return to partial activity required 18 +/- 2.5 days, and the return to full activity required 28.4 +/- 5.6 days. As compared with the overall costs for a conventional sigmoid colectomy, which are completely covered by the National Bureau of Health Insurance of Taiwan, the expenses for the patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures were significantly higher by approximately 24,000.0 NT dollars +/- 2,635.0 (1 U.S. dollar = 32 NT dollars). These higher expenses must be borne by the patients themselves.
Considering that patients with sigmoid volvulus often are elderly and chronically ill, laparoscopic elective surgery after a successful colonoscopic decompression may be a good choice for a selected group of patients in terms of minimized surgical complications and quick convalescence.
腹腔镜治疗乙状结肠扭转是一种罕见的手术适应症。这项2期研究调查了择期腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠扭转的可行性和手术效果。
乙状结肠扭转患者首先接受结肠镜减压以缓解急性结肠梗阻。如果结肠减压成功,则进行全肠道准备,随后进行择期腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠切除术。腹腔镜手术的详细步骤见视频。简而言之,通过腹腔镜从内侧到外侧的解剖顺序完全游离冗长的乙状结肠,然后将其拖出体外,切断并进行端端吻合重建。根据作者的经验,从内侧到外侧的方法在腹腔镜游离冗长乙状结肠方面效率很高。我们认为,乙状结肠在侧腹壁的附着保留得越长,暴露越好,解剖越容易。如果在特定病例中吻合口漏的风险被认为很高,则选择性地进行保护性回肠造口术。在进入本研究之前,已向患者充分告知腹腔镜手术的优缺点。根据适当的入选标准选择性招募患者。本研究经国立台湾大学医院机构审查委员会批准。对患者的临床病理数据和手术结果进行前瞻性评估。
2001年8月至2005年4月,共有14例乙状结肠扭转患者(10例男性,4例女性)接受了上述手术治疗。患者的年龄分布为68.4±12.2岁。8例患者乙状结肠扭转发作是首次发作,4例是第二次发作,2例是第三次(或更多次)发作。患者的体重指数(BMI)为26.8±4.4kg/m²。身体状况(美国麻醉医师协会[ASA]分级):5例为1级,8例为2级,1例为3级。腹腔镜检查时,所有患者均呈现乙状结肠扭转的特征性表现,包括冗长的乙状结肠、狭窄的乙状结肠系膜蒂以及伴有系膜纤维化和瘢痕形成的乙状结肠系膜炎症,如视频所示。切除结肠的长度为32±6cm。手术时间为194.6±32.4分钟,失血量为44.0±12.4ml。腹部伤口由四个5至12mm的操作孔和一个5cm的主要伤口组成,用于乙状结肠拖出体外。一些外科医生表明,由于乙状结肠冗长,可以通过5cm的左下象限切口切除乙状结肠扭转,且结肠游离很少。在这种情况下,腹腔镜手术在乙状结肠充分切除、乙状结肠系膜粘连松解和无张力结直肠吻合方面与小切口剖腹手术方法竞争。仅1例ASA身体状况为3级的患者进行了保护性回肠造口术。本病例系列无死亡病例。然而,1例患者术后发生肺炎,1例发生急性心肌梗死,2例发生伤口感染。排除发生术后肺炎和急性心肌梗死的2例患者,术后肠梗阻持续时间为48±12小时,术后住院时间为7±1天,根据视觉模拟评分法,术后疼痛程度为3.5±0.5。恢复部分活动需要18±2.5天,恢复完全活动需要28.4±5.6天。与台湾地区国民健康保险完全覆盖的传统乙状结肠切除术的总体费用相比,接受腹腔镜手术患者的费用显著高出约24000.0新台币±2635.0(1美元=32新台币)。这些较高的费用必须由患者自行承担。
考虑到乙状结肠扭转患者通常为老年人且患有慢性病,在结肠镜减压成功后进行腹腔镜择期手术,对于特定患者群体而言,在将手术并发症降至最低和快速康复方面可能是一个不错的选择。