• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾上腺素注射联合可分离圈套器与单纯肾上腺素注射预防大肠大息肉切除术后出血的前瞻性随机对照研究

A prospective, randomized comparison of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare versus adrenaline injection alone in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large colonic polyps.

作者信息

Paspatis Gregorios A, Paraskeva Konstantina, Theodoropoulou Angeliki, Mathou Nikoletta, Vardas Emmanouil, Oustamanolakis Pantelis, Chlouverakis Gregorios, Karagiannis Ioannis

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Benizelion General Hospital, Heraklion-Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2805; quiz 2913. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00855.x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00855.x
PMID:17026560
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our study sought to compare the efficacy of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare versus adrenaline injection alone in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large colonic polyps.

METHODS

At the time of colonoscopy, patients with at least one colonic polyp > or =2 cm were randomized to receive treatment either by the injection of a 1:10.000 solution of adrenaline and the position of a detachable snare followed by a conventional snare polypectomy (group A) or injection of adrenaline followed by a conventional snare polypectomy (group B). A total of 159 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to one of the above groups. Out of them, 84 patients (47 men, 37 women, mean age 61 yr) were assigned to group A and 75 (37 men, 38 women, mean age 64 yr) to group B. Early (<24 h) and late (>24 h-30 days) bleeding complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall bleeding complications occurred in 10/159 (6.2%) of the patients. There were two cases of bleeding in group A (2.3%), and eight in group B (10.6%) (P= 0.04). The number of early bleeding episodes was significantly reduced in group A patients (1 case) compared to that of group B (7 cases) (P= 0.02). In contrast, there was no significant difference between group A and B as far as late bleeding is concerned.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the use of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare may significantly decrease the number of early postpolypectomy bleeding episodes in patients with large colonic polyps.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较肾上腺素注射联合可分离圈套器与单纯肾上腺素注射在预防大肠大息肉切除术后出血方面的疗效。

方法

在结肠镜检查时,将至少有一个直径≥2 cm结肠息肉的患者随机分为两组,一组接受1:10000肾上腺素溶液注射,然后放置可分离圈套器,随后进行传统圈套息肉切除术(A组);另一组接受肾上腺素注射,然后进行传统圈套息肉切除术(B组)。共有159例连续患者被随机分配至上述两组。其中,84例患者(47例男性,37例女性,平均年龄61岁)被分配至A组,75例(37例男性,38例女性,平均年龄64岁)被分配至B组。评估早期(<24小时)和晚期(>24小时至30天)出血并发症。

结果

159例患者中共有10例(6.2%)发生总体出血并发症。A组有2例出血(2.3%),B组有8例(10.6%)(P = 0.04)。A组患者的早期出血事件数量(1例)明显少于B组(7例)(P = 0.02)。相比之下,就晚期出血而言,A组和B组之间没有显著差异。

结论

我们的数据表明,肾上腺素注射联合可分离圈套器的使用可能会显著减少大肠大息肉患者息肉切除术后早期出血事件的数量。

相似文献

1
A prospective, randomized comparison of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare versus adrenaline injection alone in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large colonic polyps.肾上腺素注射联合可分离圈套器与单纯肾上腺素注射预防大肠大息肉切除术后出血的前瞻性随机对照研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Dec;101(12):2805; quiz 2913. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00855.x. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
2
Detachable snare versus epinephrine injection in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding: a randomized and controlled study.可分离圈套器与肾上腺素注射预防息肉切除术后出血的随机对照研究。
Endoscopy. 2004 Oct;36(10):860-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-825801.
3
Combined technique (adrenaline injection plus endoloop) versus single technique (adrenaline injection) in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in large pedunculated colonic polyps.联合技术(肾上腺素注射加内镜圈套器)与单一技术(肾上腺素注射)预防大肠带蒂大息肉息肉切除术后出血的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 May;102(5):1137-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01180_13.x.
4
Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study.内镜下切除大型有蒂结肠息肉,肾上腺素注射与圈套器和止血夹相比预防息肉切除术后出血的风险:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
Surg Endosc. 2009 Dec;23(12):2732-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0478-3. Epub 2009 May 9.
5
Influence of prophylactic local administration of epinephrine on bleeding complications after polypectomy.预防性局部应用肾上腺素对息肉切除术后出血并发症的影响。
Endoscopy. 1997 Jan;29(1):31-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004058.
6
Is submucosal epinephrine injection necessary before polypectomy? A prospective, comparative study.息肉切除术前是否需要黏膜下注射肾上腺素?一项前瞻性对照研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Sep-Oct;48(41):1379-82.
7
Comparison of prophylactic clip and endoloop application for the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding in pedunculated colonic polyps: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.对比预防性夹闭和圈套结扎在预防有蒂结直肠息肉切除术后出血的应用:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究。
Endoscopy. 2014 Jul;46(7):598-604. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1365515. Epub 2014 May 15.
8
A prospective, randomized comparison of 10-Fr versus 7-Fr bipolar electrocoagulation catheter in combination with adrenaline injection in the endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers.10 Fr与7 Fr双极电凝导管联合肾上腺素注射在内镜下治疗消化性溃疡出血中的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2192-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07691.x.
9
Endoscopic snare excision of large pedunculated colorectal polyps: a new, safe, and effective technique.内镜圈套器切除大肠带蒂大息肉:一种新的、安全有效的技术。
Endoscopy. 2001 Oct;33(10):854-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-17329.
10
A prospective randomized comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗小型结直肠息肉术后出血的前瞻性随机比较。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):e345-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02696.x.

引用本文的文献

1
S-EMR: A first experience with stalked endoscopic mucosal resection in thick and high-risk pedunculated polyps.S-EMR:带蒂内镜黏膜切除术治疗粗大及高危带蒂息肉的初步经验
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Jul 31;27:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.07.005. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Survey of the Actual Practices Used for Endoscopic Removal of Colon Polyps in Korea: A Comparison with the Current Guidelines.韩国内镜下切除结肠息肉实际操作的调查:与现行指南的比较
Gut Liver. 2025 Jan 15;19(1):77-86. doi: 10.5009/gnl240217. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
3
Endoscopic management of giant colonic polyps: a retrospective Italian study.
巨大结肠息肉的内镜治疗:一项意大利回顾性研究。
Clin Endosc. 2024 Jul;57(4):501-507. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.229. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
4
Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances.困难性结直肠息肉切除术:技术要点与最新进展。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 May 7;29(17):2600-2615. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2600.
5
Endoloop-Assisted Polypectomy for a Symptomatic Giant Colonic Polyp in a Pediatric Patient.小儿患者有症状的巨大结肠息肉的Endoloop辅助息肉切除术
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;9(2):222. doi: 10.3390/children9020222.
6
Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients.结直肠息肉内镜切除术后延迟出血:识别高危患者
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 24;14:477-492. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S282699. eCollection 2021.
7
Prevention of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding: Should we amend the 2017 ESGE Guideline?息肉切除术后迟发性出血的预防:我们是否应该修订2017年欧洲胃肠道内镜学会指南?
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Sep;8(9):E1111-E1114. doi: 10.1055/a-1196-1602. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Clinical guidance on endoscopic management of colonic polyps in Singapore.新加坡结肠息肉内镜管理临床指南。
Singapore Med J. 2022 Apr;63(4):173-186. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020108. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
9
Practice patterns and predictors of prophylactic endoscopic clip usage during polypectomy.息肉切除术中预防性内镜夹使用的实践模式及预测因素
Endosc Int Open. 2019 Sep;7(9):E1051-E1060. doi: 10.1055/a-0953-1787. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
10
Endoscopic Management of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding.息肉切除术后出血的内镜治疗
Clin Endosc. 2020 May;53(3):302-310. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.062. Epub 2019 Sep 17.