Lugtenberg Marjolein, Heiligers Phil J M, de Jong Judith D, Hingstman Lammert
NIVEL--Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 6;6:126. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-126.
Although medical specialists traditionally hold negative views towards working part-time, the practice of medicine has evolved. Given the trend towards more part-time work and that there is no evidence that it compromises the quality of care, attitudes towards part-time work may have changed as well in recent years. The aim of this paper was to examine the possible changes in attitudes towards part-time work among specialists in internal medicine between 1996 and 2004. Moreover, we wanted to determine whether these attitudes were associated with individual characteristics (age, gender, investments in work) and whether attitudes of specialists within a partnership showed more resemblance than specialists' attitudes from different partnerships.
Two samples were used in this study: data of a survey conducted in 1996 and in 2004. After selecting internal medicine specialists working in general hospitals in The Netherlands, the sample consisted of 219 specialists in 1996 and 363 specialists in 2004. They were sent a questionnaire, including topics on the attitudes towards part-time work.
Internal medicine specialists' attitudes towards working part-time became slightly more positive between 1996 and 2004. Full-time working specialists in 2004 still expressed concerns regarding the investments of part-timers in overhead tasks, the flexibility of task division, efficiency, communication and continuity of care. In 1996 gender was the only predictor of the attitude, in 2004 being a full- or a part-timer, age and the time invested in work were associated with this attitude. Furthermore, specialists' attitudes were not found to cluster much within partnerships.
In spite of the increasing number of specialists working or preferring to work part-time, part-time practice among internal medicine specialists seems not to be fully accepted. The results indicate that the attitudes are no longer gender based, but are associated with age and work aspects such as the number of hours worked. Though there is little evidence to support them, negative ideas about the consequences of part-time work for the quality of care still exist. Policy should be aimed at removing the organisational difficulties related to part-time work and create a system in which part-time practice is fully integrated and accepted.
尽管医学专家传统上对兼职工作持负面看法,但医疗行业已经有所发展。鉴于兼职工作越来越普遍,且没有证据表明兼职会影响医疗质量,近年来人们对兼职工作的态度可能也发生了变化。本文旨在研究1996年至2004年间内科专家对兼职工作态度的可能变化。此外,我们想确定这些态度是否与个人特征(年龄、性别、工作投入)相关,以及合伙制下专家的态度是否比不同合伙制下专家的态度更相似。
本研究使用了两个样本:1996年和2004年进行的一项调查数据。在选取荷兰综合医院工作的内科专家后,样本在1996年包括219名专家,2004年包括363名专家。他们收到一份问卷,其中包括关于对兼职工作态度的主题。
1996年至2004年间,内科专家对兼职工作的态度略有更积极。2004年的全职工作专家仍对兼职人员在间接费用任务上的投入、任务分配的灵活性、效率、沟通和护理连续性表示担忧。1996年,性别是态度的唯一预测因素,2004年,是全职还是兼职、年龄和工作投入时间与这种态度相关。此外,未发现专家的态度在合伙制内部有太多聚类。
尽管越来越多的专家从事或倾向于从事兼职工作,但内科专家的兼职做法似乎尚未得到充分认可。结果表明,态度不再基于性别,而是与年龄和工作方面(如工作时长)相关。尽管几乎没有证据支持,但关于兼职工作对医疗质量影响的负面观念仍然存在。政策应旨在消除与兼职工作相关的组织困难,并创建一个兼职做法完全融入并被接受的体系。