Campbell Oona M R, Graham Wendy J
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1284-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69381-1.
The concept of knowing what works in terms of reducing maternal mortality is complicated by a huge diversity of country contexts and of determinants of maternal health. Here we aim to show that, despite this complexity, only a few strategic choices need to be made to reduce maternal mortality. We begin by presenting the logic that informs our strategic choices. This logic suggests that implementation of an effective intrapartum-care strategy is an overwhelming priority. We also discuss the alternative configurations of such a strategy and, using the best available evidence, prioritise one strategy based on delivery in primary-level institutions (health centres), backed up by access to referral-level facilities. We then go on to discuss strategies that complement intrapartum care. We conclude by discussing the inexplicable hesitation in decision-making after nearly 20 years of safe motherhood programming: if the fifth Millennium Development Goal is to be achieved, then what needs to be prioritised is obvious. Further delays in getting on with what works begs questions about the commitment of decision-makers to this goal.
鉴于各国国情以及孕产妇健康决定因素存在巨大差异,确定哪些措施能够降低孕产妇死亡率这一问题变得极为复杂。在此,我们旨在表明,尽管存在这种复杂性,但要降低孕产妇死亡率只需做出少数几个战略选择。我们首先阐述指导我们战略选择的逻辑。这一逻辑表明,实施有效的分娩期护理战略是压倒一切的优先事项。我们还讨论了此类战略的不同组合方式,并依据现有最佳证据,将基于基层机构(保健中心)分娩并辅以转诊机构服务的一种战略列为优先选项。接着,我们继续讨论补充分娩期护理的战略。最后,我们探讨了在安全孕产规划开展近20年后决策过程中令人费解的迟疑态度:若要实现千年发展目标5,那么优先事项显而易见。继续拖延实施有效措施难免让人质疑决策者对这一目标的承诺。