Hoyt Donald F, Wickler Steven J, Dutto Darren J, Catterfeld Gwenn E, Johnsen Devin
Equine Research Center and Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California 91768, USA.
J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol. 2006 Nov 1;305(11):912-22. doi: 10.1002/jez.a.335.
Are the different energy-conserving mechanics (i.e., pendulum and spring) used in different gaits reflected in differences in energetics and/or stride parameters? The analysis included published data from several species and new data from horses. When changing from pendulum to spring mechanics, there is a change in the slope of metabolic rate (MR) vs. speed in all species, in birds and quadrupeds there is no step increase, and in humans there are conflicting reports. At the trot-gallop transition, where quadrupeds are hypothesized to change from spring mechanics to some combination of spring and pendulum mechanics, there is a change in slope of MR vs. speed in horses but not in other species. Stride frequency (SF) is a logarithmic function of walking speed in all species, a linear function of trotting/running speed, and nearly independent of speed in galloping. In humans and horses there is a discontinuity in SF at the walk-trot (run) transition but not in birds. The slope of time of contact vs. speed does not change with mechanics in most species, but it does in humans. In horses and humans, there is a discontinuity at the walk-trot (run) transition and data for other species do not permit generalization. Duty factor (DF) in humans is greater than 0.5 in walking (pendulum mechanics) and less than 0.5 when running (spring mechanics). However, this is not true in many species that have DF>0.5 at the lowest speeds where they use spring mechanics. When trotting at low speeds, horses use forelimb DF>0.5 and hind limb DF<0.5. Thus, it is confusing to distinguish between walking and running by DF.
不同步态中使用的不同节能机制(即钟摆式和弹簧式)是否反映在能量学和/或步幅参数的差异中?该分析包括来自多个物种的已发表数据和来自马的新数据。当从钟摆式机制转变为弹簧式机制时,所有物种的代谢率(MR)与速度的斜率都会发生变化,鸟类和四足动物没有阶跃增加,而关于人类的报道则相互矛盾。在小跑-疾驰过渡阶段,假设四足动物从弹簧式机制转变为弹簧式和钟摆式机制的某种组合,马的MR与速度的斜率会发生变化,而其他物种则不会。步频(SF)在所有物种中都是步行速度的对数函数,是小跑/奔跑速度的线性函数,并且在疾驰时几乎与速度无关。在人类和马中,步行-小跑(奔跑)过渡时SF存在不连续性,而鸟类则没有。大多数物种中接触时间与速度的斜率不会随机制变化,但人类会。在马和人类中,步行-小跑(奔跑)过渡时存在不连续性,其他物种的数据无法一概而论。人类的负荷系数(DF)在步行时(钟摆式机制)大于0.5,在跑步时(弹簧式机制)小于0.5。然而,在许多物种中并非如此,它们在使用弹簧式机制的最低速度下DF>0.5。马在低速小跑时,前肢DF>0.5,后肢DF<0.5。因此,通过DF来区分步行和奔跑是令人困惑的。