McIntyre Grant T, Millett Declan T
Orthodontic Department, Dundee Dental Hospital and School, Dundee, UK.
Angle Orthod. 2006 Sep;76(5):739-44. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0739:LSAPIC]2.0.CO;2.
To determine whether differences exist in the shape and position of the lips between Class II division 2 and Class I malocclusions.
Lateral cephalometric radiographs of subjects with Class II division 2 (n = 30) and Class I (n = 30) incisor relationships were scanned at 300 dpi to produce digital images. These were subsequently digitized in random order. Twenty-one landmarks characterizing the upper and lower lips and the maxillary and mandibular central incisors were digitized. Procrustes algorithms optimally superimposed the landmark configurations to standardize size, location, and orientation. Discriminant analysis of the principal components of shape determined the differences between the Class II division 2 and Class I groups.
The shape and position of the upper and lower lips differed significantly between the Class II division 2 group and the Class I group (P < .001). Principal component (PC) 1 (46% of the variance) involved an increase in the thickness of the upper and lower lips in the Class II division 2 group. PC2 (11% of the variance) was characterized by a relatively higher lip line in the Class II division 2 group.
The shape and position of the lips differ between Class II division 2 and Class I malocclusions.
确定安氏II类2分类错 与安氏I类错 之间唇部的形状和位置是否存在差异。
对安氏II类2分类(n = 30)和安氏I类(n = 30)切牙关系患者的头颅侧位片以300 dpi进行扫描以生成数字图像。随后将这些图像随机数字化。对上唇、下唇、上颌中切牙和下颌中切牙的21个标志点进行数字化。普洛克斯算法对标志点构型进行最佳叠加,以标准化大小、位置和方向。对形状主成分进行判别分析,确定安氏II类2分类组与安氏I类组之间的差异。
安氏II类2分类组与安氏I类组之间上、下唇的形状和位置存在显著差异(P <.001)。主成分(PC)1(占方差的46%)涉及安氏II类2分类组上、下唇厚度增加。PC2(占方差的11%)的特征是安氏II类2分类组的唇线相对较高。
安氏II类2分类错 与安氏I类错 之间唇部的形状和位置存在差异。