McIntyre Grant T, Millett Declan T
Orthodontic Department, Unit of Orthodontics, Glasgow Dental Hospital and Dental School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, UK.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):710-5. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0710:CSOTPM>2.0.CO;2.
This study aimed to determine whether the lateral cephalometric crown-root shape differs among the permanent maxillary central incisor in Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2 and Class III malocclusions and to identify the nature of any differences. Of the 499 lateral cephalograms recorded at a university orthodontic clinic during 2001, 361 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Sixty cephalograms were selected from the four malocclusion groups and were digitized in random order. The configurations of the 10 landmarks characterizing the crown-root shape of the permanent maxillary central incisor were then optimally superimposed using Procrustes algorithms. Discriminant analysis of the principal components of shape determined the incisor shape differences between the malocclusion groups. The crown-root shape of the permanent maxillary central incisor did not differ significantly among the Class I, Class II division 1, and Class III groups (P > .05); however, the crown-root shape of the Class II division 2 permanent maxillary central incisor was significantly different (P < .001) from that of the Class 1, Class II division 1 and Class III. The shape discrimination involved axial bending of the Class II division 2 incisors. Principal components 1, 2, and 3 accounted for 63% of the Class II division 2 incisor shape variance, encompassing a shorter root, a longer crown, and axial bending of the incisor, in addition to a reduced labiopalatal thickness. These shape features could precipitate the development of a deep overbite in Class II division 2 malocclusion and may limit the amount of palatal root torque during fixed appliance therapy.
本研究旨在确定恒牙上颌中切牙在安氏Ⅰ类、安氏Ⅱ类1分类、安氏Ⅱ类2分类和安氏Ⅲ类错牙合中的侧位头影测量冠根形态是否存在差异,并明确任何差异的性质。2001年在一所大学正畸诊所记录的499张侧位头影片中,361张符合纳入标准。从四个错牙合组中选取60张头影片,并按随机顺序进行数字化处理。然后使用普氏算法对表征恒牙上颌中切牙冠根形态的10个标志点的构型进行最佳叠加。对形状主成分的判别分析确定了错牙合组之间切牙形状的差异。恒牙上颌中切牙的冠根形态在安氏Ⅰ类、安氏Ⅱ类1分类和安氏Ⅲ类组之间无显著差异(P>0.05);然而,安氏Ⅱ类2分类恒牙上颌中切牙的冠根形态与安氏Ⅰ类、安氏Ⅱ类1分类和安氏Ⅲ类相比有显著差异(P<0.001)。形状判别涉及安氏Ⅱ类2分类切牙的轴向弯曲。主成分1、2和3占安氏Ⅱ类2分类切牙形状变异的63%,包括较短的牙根、较长的牙冠、切牙的轴向弯曲,以及唇腭厚度的减小。这些形状特征可能促使安氏Ⅱ类2分类错牙合中深覆牙合的发展,并可能限制固定矫治器治疗期间腭根转矩的量。