Collins C D, Purohit S, Podolsky R H, Zhao H S, Schatz D, Eckenrode S E, Yang P, Hopkins D, Muir A, Hoffman M, McIndoe R A, Rewers M, She J X
Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th Street, CA4124, Augusta, GA 30912-2400, United States.
Vascul Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;45(5):258-67. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Aug 18.
The long asymptomatic period before the onset of chronic diseases offers good opportunities for disease prevention. Indeed, many chronic diseases may be preventable by avoiding those factors that trigger the disease process (primary prevention) or by use of therapy that modulates the disease process before the onset of clinical symptoms (secondary prevention). Accurate prediction is vital for disease prevention so that therapy can be given to those individuals who are most likely to develop the disease. The utility of predictive markers is dependent on three parameters, which must be carefully assessed: sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value. Specificity is important if a biomarker is to be used to identify individuals either for counseling or for preventive therapy. However, a reciprocal relationship exists between sensitivity and specificity. Thus, successful biomarkers will be highly specific without sacrificing sensitivity. Unfortunately, biomarkers with ideal specificity and sensitivity are difficult to find for many diseases. One potential solution is to use the combinatorial power of a large number of biomarkers, each of which alone may not offer satisfactory specificity and sensitivity. Recent technological advances in genetics, genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics offer a great opportunity for biomarker discovery. The newly identified biomarkers have the potential to bring increased accuracy in disease diagnosis and classification, as well as therapeutic monitoring. In this review, we will use type 1 diabetes (T1D) as an example, when appropriate, to discuss pertinent issues related to high throughput biomarker discovery.
慢性疾病发作前漫长的无症状期为疾病预防提供了良好契机。的确,许多慢性疾病或许可通过避免触发疾病进程的因素(一级预防)或在临床症状出现前使用调节疾病进程的疗法(二级预防)来预防。准确预测对于疾病预防至关重要,这样就能对最有可能患病的个体进行治疗。预测标志物的效用取决于三个参数,必须仔细评估:敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值。如果要使用生物标志物来识别个体以进行咨询或预防性治疗,特异性很重要。然而,敏感性和特异性之间存在反比关系。因此,成功的生物标志物在不牺牲敏感性的情况下将具有高度特异性。不幸的是,对于许多疾病而言,很难找到具有理想特异性和敏感性的生物标志物。一种潜在的解决方案是利用大量生物标志物的组合力量,其中每个生物标志物单独使用时可能无法提供令人满意的特异性和敏感性。遗传学、基因组学、蛋白质组学和生物信息学领域的最新技术进展为生物标志物发现提供了绝佳机会。新发现的生物标志物有可能提高疾病诊断、分类以及治疗监测的准确性。在本综述中,我们将酌情以1型糖尿病(T1D)为例,讨论与高通量生物标志物发现相关的相关问题。