Jin Yulan, She Jin-Xiong
Center for Biotechnology and Genomic Medicine and Department of Pathology, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Rev Diabet Stud. 2012 Winter;9(4):224-35. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2012.9.224. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Biomarkers are useful tools for research into type 1 diabetes (T1D) for a number of purposes, including elucidation of disease pathogenesis, risk prediction, and therapeutic monitoring. Susceptibility genes and islet autoantibodies are currently the most useful biomarkers for T1D risk prediction. However, these markers do not fully meet the needs of scientists and physicians for several reasons. First, improvement of the specificity and sensitivity is still desirable to achieve better positive predictive values. Second, autoantibodies appear relatively late in the disease process, thus limiting their value in early disease prediction. Third, the currently available biomarkers are not useful for assessing therapeutic outcomes because some are not involved in the disease process (autoantibodies) and others do not change during disease progression (susceptibility genes). Therefore, considerable effort has been devoted to the discovery of novel T1D biomarkers in the last three decades. The advent of high-throughput technologies for genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies has allowed genome-wide examinations of genetic polymorphisms, global gene changes, and protein expression changes in T1D patients and prediabetic subjects. These large-scale studies resulted in the discovery of a large number of susceptibility genes and changes in gene and protein expression. While these studies have provided a number of novel biomarker candidates, their clinical benefits remain to be evaluated in prospective studies, and no new "star biomarker" has been identified until now. Previous studies suggest that significant improvements in study design and analytical methodologies have to be made to identify clinically relevant biomarkers. In this review, we discuss progress, opportunities, challenges, and future directions in the development of T1D biomarkers, mainly by focusing on the genetic, transcriptomic, and proteomic aspects.
生物标志物是用于1型糖尿病(T1D)研究的有用工具,可用于多种目的,包括阐明疾病发病机制、风险预测和治疗监测。易感性基因和胰岛自身抗体是目前T1D风险预测中最有用的生物标志物。然而,由于多种原因,这些标志物不能完全满足科学家和医生的需求。首先,仍需要提高特异性和敏感性以获得更好的阳性预测值。其次,自身抗体在疾病过程中出现相对较晚,因此限制了它们在疾病早期预测中的价值。第三,目前可用的生物标志物对评估治疗结果无用,因为一些不参与疾病过程(自身抗体),而另一些在疾病进展过程中不会改变(易感性基因)。因此,在过去三十年中,人们投入了大量精力来发现新型T1D生物标志物。用于基因、转录组和蛋白质组研究的高通量技术的出现,使得能够对T1D患者和糖尿病前期受试者的基因多态性、全局基因变化和蛋白质表达变化进行全基因组检查。这些大规模研究发现了大量的易感性基因以及基因和蛋白质表达的变化。虽然这些研究提供了许多新型生物标志物候选物,但它们的临床益处仍有待在前瞻性研究中进行评估,并且到目前为止尚未发现新的“明星生物标志物”。先前的研究表明,必须在研究设计和分析方法上取得重大改进,以识别临床相关的生物标志物。在这篇综述中,我们主要通过关注遗传、转录组和蛋白质组方面,讨论T1D生物标志物开发的进展、机遇、挑战和未来方向。