Mehl Anne, Rolinck-Werninghaus Claudia, Staden Ute, Verstege Andrea, Wahn Ulrich, Beyer Kirsten, Niggemann Bodo
Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Immunology, University Children's Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Oct;118(4):923-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Aug 24.
There is an increasing need to develop test instruments that make oral food challenges superfluous.
We sought to study the utility of atopy patch tests (APTs) in the diagnostic workup of food allergy.
We investigated 437 children (median age, 13 months; 90% with atopic dermatitis) referred for evaluation of suspected food allergy. Specific serum IgE (sIgE) measurements, skin prick tests (SPTs), APTs, and controlled oral food challenges were performed.
We analyzed 873 oral challenges with cow's milk, hen's egg, wheat, and/or soy. One thousand seven hundred single APTs were performed. As a single parameter, the APTs showed the best specificity compared with sIgE measurements, SPTs, or both. Combining the APT with either the SPT or sIgE measurement resulted in improved sensitivity and specificity. Decision points for sIgE measurement and for the SPT showed lower values when combined with a positive APT result. Correctly bypassing an oral food challenge with combined testing, including APTs, only between 0.5% and 7% (99% predicted probability) and between 6% and 14% (using 95% predicted probability) of children would fulfill the criteria for avoiding an oral food challenge.
Although the predictive capacity of the APT is improved when combined with sIgE measurement or the SPT, oral food challenges become superfluous in only 0.5% to 14% of study patients. In addition, the APT is time consuming and demands a highly experienced test evaluator.
For daily clinical practice, the APT adds only a small predictive value to the standard SPT and sIgE measurement in the diagnostic workup of suspected food-related symptoms in our study population.
开发使口服食物激发试验不再必要的检测工具的需求日益增加。
我们试图研究特应性皮炎贴片试验(APTs)在食物过敏诊断检查中的效用。
我们调查了437名因疑似食物过敏而转诊评估的儿童(中位年龄13个月;90%患有特应性皮炎)。进行了特异性血清IgE(sIgE)检测、皮肤点刺试验(SPTs)、APTs和对照口服食物激发试验。
我们分析了873次针对牛奶、鸡蛋、小麦和/或大豆的口服激发试验。进行了1700次单次APTs。作为单一参数,与sIgE检测、SPTs或两者相比,APTs显示出最佳的特异性。将APTs与SPT或sIgE检测相结合可提高敏感性和特异性。当与阳性APTs结果结合时,sIgE检测和SPT的判定点显示出较低的值。通过包括APTs在内的联合检测正确避免口服食物激发试验,只有0.5%至7%(预测概率99%)以及6%至14%(使用预测概率95%)的儿童符合避免口服食物激发试验的标准。
尽管将APTs与sIgE检测或SPT相结合时其预测能力有所提高,但在仅0.5%至14%的研究患者中口服食物激发试验变得不再必要。此外,APTs耗时且需要经验丰富的检测评估人员。
在我们的研究人群中,对于日常临床实践,在疑似食物相关症状的诊断检查中,APTs对标准SPT和sIgE检测仅增加了很小的预测价值。