Duffus John H
The Edinburgh Centre for Toxicology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;47(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Oct 6.
It is argued that, because of inherent weaknesses in design and procedure, the U.S. National Toxicology Program study of the carcinogenicity of inhaled vanadium pentoxide does not provide adequate evidence to support the classification by regulatory authorities of vanadium pentoxide as a Group 2B (possible) human carcinogen. The extension by one regulatory authority of the carcinogenicity classification for vanadium pentoxide to cover all vanadium compounds is also questioned. Such an extension implies that the toxic effect of some unknown vanadium species is more powerful than that of any oxygen species generated from the oxygen atoms in vanadium pentoxide, and that vanadium in any form can be converted in vivo to an undefined toxic species. There is no experimental or theoretical basis supporting this hypothesis. For oxygen-containing compounds like vanadium pentoxide, there is a need for some form of toxicity classification related to their oxygen content since it is likely to be the most reactive component of such compounds. For all particulates, such as those of crystalline vanadium pentoxide, the special toxicity of particulates, and especially nanoparticles, also needs separate consideration and classification.
有人认为,由于设计和程序上的固有缺陷,美国国家毒理学计划对吸入五氧化二钒致癌性的研究并未提供充分证据,以支持监管机构将五氧化二钒归类为2B组(可能)人类致癌物。一个监管机构将五氧化二钒的致癌性分类扩展到涵盖所有钒化合物的做法也受到质疑。这种扩展意味着某些未知钒物种的毒性作用比五氧化二钒中氧原子产生的任何氧物种的毒性作用更强,并且任何形式的钒在体内都可以转化为一种未定义的有毒物种。没有实验或理论依据支持这一假设。对于像五氧化二钒这样的含氧化合物,由于氧含量可能是此类化合物中最具反应性的成分,因此需要某种与氧含量相关的毒性分类。对于所有颗粒物,如结晶五氧化二钒颗粒,颗粒物尤其是纳米颗粒的特殊毒性也需要单独考虑和分类。