Scheffel Hans, Alkadhi Hatem, Plass André, Vachenauer Robert, Desbiolles Lotus, Gaemperli Oliver, Schepis Tiziano, Frauenfelder Thomas, Schertler Thomas, Husmann Lars, Grunenfelder Jürg, Genoni Michele, Kaufmann Philipp A, Marincek Borut, Leschka Sebastian
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol. 2006 Dec;16(12):2739-47. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0. Epub 2006 Sep 19.
The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a population with extensive coronary calcifications without heart rate control. Thirty patients (24 male, 6 female, mean age 63.1+/-11.3 years) with a high pre-test probability of CAD underwent DSCT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 14+/-9 days. No beta-blockers were administered prior to the scan. Two readers independently assessed image quality of all coronary segments with a diameter > or =1.5 mm using a four-point score (1: excellent to 4: not assessable) and qualitatively assessed significant stenoses as narrowing of the luminal diameter >50%. Causes of false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) ratings were assigned to calcifications or motion artifacts. ICA was considered the standard of reference. Mean body mass index was 28.3+/-3.9 kg/m2 (range 22.4-36.3 kg/m2), mean heart rate during CT was 70.3+/-14.2 bpm (range 47-102 bpm), and mean Agatston score was 821+/-904 (range 0-3,110). Image quality was diagnostic (scores 1-3) in 98.6% (414/420) of segments (mean image quality score 1.68+/-0.75); six segments in three patients were considered not assessable (1.4%). DSCT correctly identified 54 of 56 significant coronary stenoses. Severe calcifications accounted for false ratings in nine segments (eight FP/one FN) and motion artifacts in two segments (one FP/one FN). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for evaluating CAD were 96.4, 97.5, 85.7, and 99.4%, respectively. First experience indicates that DSCT coronary angiography provides high diagnostic accuracy for assessment of CAD in a high pre-test probability population with extensive coronary calcifications and without heart rate control.
本研究的目的是评估双源计算机断层扫描(DSCT)在未进行心率控制的广泛冠状动脉钙化人群中评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的诊断准确性。30例CAD预测试概率较高的患者(24例男性,6例女性,平均年龄63.1±11.3岁)在14±9天内接受了DSCT冠状动脉造影和有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)。扫描前未给予β受体阻滞剂。两名阅片者使用四点评分(1:优秀至4:不可评估)独立评估所有直径≥1.5 mm的冠状动脉节段的图像质量,并定性评估显著狭窄为管腔直径狭窄>50%。假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN)评级的原因归因于钙化或运动伪影。ICA被视为参考标准。平均体重指数为28.3±3.9 kg/m2(范围22.4 - 36.3 kg/m2),CT期间平均心率为70.3±14.2次/分(范围47 - 102次/分),平均阿加斯顿评分821±904(范围0 - 3,110)。98.6%(414/420)的节段图像质量可用于诊断(评分1 - 3)(平均图像质量评分为1.68±0.75);3例患者的6个节段被认为不可评估(1.4%)。DSCT正确识别了56例显著冠状动脉狭窄中的54例。严重钙化导致9个节段出现错误评级(8个FP/1个FN),运动伪影导致2个节段出现错误评级(1个FP/1个FN)。评估CAD的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为96.4%、97.5%、85.7%和99.4%。初步经验表明DSCT冠状动脉造影在预测试概率较高、有广泛冠状动脉钙化且未进行心率控制的人群中评估CAD具有较高的诊断准确性。