Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Fundamental Sciences, Jena University of Applied Sciences, Jena, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Aug;32(8):5233-5245. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08619-4. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
There is conflicting evidence about the comparative diagnostic accuracy of the Agatston score versus computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
To determine whether CTA is superior to the Agatston score in the diagnosis of CAD.
In total 2452 patients with stable chest pain and a clinical indication for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for suspected CAD were included by the Collaborative Meta-analysis of Cardiac CT (COME-CCT) Consortium. An Agatston score of > 400 was considered positive, and obstructive CAD defined as at least 50% coronary diameter stenosis on ICA was used as the reference standard.
Obstructive CAD was diagnosed in 44.9% of patients (1100/2452). The median Agatston score was 74. Diagnostic accuracy of CTA for the detection of obstructive CAD (81.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.5 to 84.1%) was significantly higher than that of the Agatston score (68.8%, 95% CI: 64.2 to 73.1%, p < 0.001). Among patients with an Agatston score of zero, 17% (101/600) had obstructive CAD. Diagnostic accuracy of CTA was not significantly different in patients with low to intermediate (1 to < 100, 100-400) versus moderate to high Agatston scores (401-1000, > 1000).
Results in our international cohort show CTA to have significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than the Agatston score in patients with stable chest pain, suspected CAD, and a clinical indication for ICA. Diagnostic performance of CTA is not affected by a higher Agatston score while an Agatston score of zero does not reliably exclude obstructive CAD.
• CTA showed significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (81.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 77.5 to 84.1%) for diagnosis of coronary artery disease when compared to the Agatston score (68.8%, 95% CI: 64.2 to 73.1%, p < 0.001). • Diagnostic performance of CTA was not affected by increased amount of calcium and was not significantly different in patients with low to intermediate (1 to <100, 100-400) versus moderate to high Agatston scores (401-1000, > 1000). • Seventeen percent of patients with an Agatston score of zero showed obstructive coronary artery disease by invasive angiography showing absence of coronary artery calcium cannot reliably exclude coronary artery disease.
关于可疑阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的 Agatston 评分与计算机断层血管造影(CTA)的比较诊断准确性存在相互矛盾的证据。
确定 CTA 是否优于 Agatston 评分在 CAD 的诊断中。
COLLABORATIVE META-ANALYSIS OF CARDIO CT(COME-CCT)联合会共纳入了 2452 例因疑似 CAD 而行有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)的稳定型胸痛患者。Agatston 评分>400 被认为是阳性,ICA 上至少有 50%的冠状动脉直径狭窄定义为阻塞性 CAD。
44.9%的患者(1100/2452)诊断为阻塞性 CAD。中位数 Agatston 评分为 74。CTA 检测阻塞性 CAD 的诊断准确性(81.1%,95%置信区间[CI]:77.5 至 84.1%)明显高于 Agatston 评分(68.8%,95%CI:64.2 至 73.1%,p<0.001)。Agatston 评分为零的患者中有 17%(101/600)存在阻塞性 CAD。在低到中度(1 至<100,100-400)与中到高度 Agatston 评分(401-1000,>1000)的患者中,CTA 的诊断准确性没有显著差异。
我们的国际队列研究结果表明,在稳定型胸痛、疑似 CAD 和 ICA 临床指征的患者中,CTA 的诊断准确性明显高于 Agatston 评分。虽然 Agatston 评分为零并不能可靠地排除阻塞性 CAD,但 CTA 的诊断性能不受钙量增加的影响。
CTA 对冠状动脉疾病的诊断准确性(81.1%,95%置信区间[CI]:77.5 至 84.1%)明显高于 Agatston 评分(68.8%,95%CI:64.2 至 73.1%,p<0.001)。
CTA 的诊断性能不受钙量增加的影响,在低到中度(1 至<100,100-400)与中到高度 Agatston 评分(401-1000,>1000)的患者中,CTA 的诊断性能没有显著差异。
17%的 Agatston 评分为零的患者通过有创血管造影显示出阻塞性冠状动脉疾病,表明不存在冠状动脉钙不能可靠地排除冠状动脉疾病。