Law M, Young R, Babb J, Rad M, Sasaki T, Zagzag D, Johnson G
Department of Radiology, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Oct;27(9):1975-82.
Numerous different parameters measured by perfusion MR imaging can be used for characterizing gliomas. Parameters derived from 3 different analyses were correlated with histopathologically confirmed grade in gliomas to determine which parameters best predict tumor grade.
Seventy-four patients with gliomas underwent dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DSC MR imaging). Data were analyzed by 3 different algorithms. Analysis 1 estimated relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) by using a single compartment model. Analysis 2 estimated fractional plasma volume (V(p)) and vascular transfer constant (K(trans)) by using a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Analysis 3 estimated absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) by using a single compartment model and an automated arterial input function. The Mann-Whitney U test was used make pairwise comparisons. Binary logistic regression was used to assess whether rCBV, V(p), K(trans), CBV, CBF, and MTT can discriminate high- from low-grade tumors.
rCBV was the best discriminator of tumor grade ype, followed by CBF, CBV, and K(trans). Spearman rank correlation factors were the following: rCBV = 0.812 (P < .0001), CBF = 0.677 (P < .0001), CBV = 0.604 (P < .0001), K(trans) = 0.457 (P < .0001), V(p) = 0.301 (P =.009), and MTT = 0.089 (P = .448). rCBV was the best single predictor, and K(trans) with rCBV was the best set of predictors of high-grade glioma.
rCBV, CBF, CBV K(trans), and V(p) measurements correlated well with histopathologic grade. rCBV was the best predictor of glioma grade, and the combination of rCBV with K(trans) was the best set of metrics to predict glioma grade.
灌注磁共振成像测量的众多不同参数可用于胶质瘤的特征描述。源自3种不同分析的参数与胶质瘤组织病理学确诊分级相关,以确定哪些参数能最佳预测肿瘤分级。
74例胶质瘤患者接受了动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)。数据采用3种不同算法进行分析。分析1使用单室模型估计相对脑血容量(rCBV)。分析2使用双室药代动力学模型估计血浆分数容积(V(p))和血管转运常数(K(trans))。分析3使用单室模型和自动动脉输入函数估计绝对脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)和平均通过时间(MTT)。采用曼-惠特尼U检验进行两两比较。二元逻辑回归用于评估rCBV、V(p)、K(trans)、CBV、CBF和MTT能否区分高级别与低级别肿瘤。
rCBV是肿瘤分级类型的最佳判别指标,其次是CBF、CBV和K(trans)。Spearman等级相关系数如下:rCBV = 0.812(P <.0001),CBF = 0.677(P <.0001),CBV = 0.604(P <.0001),K(trans) = 0.457(P <.0001),V(p) = 0.301(P =.009),MTT = 0.089(P =.448)。rCBV是最佳的单一预测指标,K(trans)与rCBV组合是高级别胶质瘤的最佳预测指标集。
rCBV、CBF、CBV、K(trans)和V(p)测量值与组织病理学分级相关性良好。rCBV是胶质瘤分级的最佳预测指标,rCBV与K(trans)的组合是预测胶质瘤分级的最佳指标集。