• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.使用动态磁敏感对比增强灌注磁共振成像,比较从单室获得的灌注指标与药代动力学建模方法在不同胶质瘤分级中的应用。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Oct;27(9):1975-82.
2
Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.通过动态磁敏感对比增强灌注磁共振成像比较脑血容量和血管通透性与胶质瘤分级的关系。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 May;25(5):746-55.
3
Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.动态对比增强和动态磁敏感对比灌注磁共振成像用于胶质瘤分级:使用热点和直方图分析对血管腔室和通透性参数的初步比较
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
Histogram analysis versus region of interest analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging data in the grading of cerebral gliomas.动态磁敏感对比灌注磁共振成像数据的直方图分析与感兴趣区分析在脑胶质瘤分级中的应用
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):761-6.
5
Comparison of microvascular permeability measurements, K(trans), determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2*-weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas.采用传统稳态T1加权和首过T2*加权磁共振成像方法测定的胶质瘤和脑膜瘤微血管通透性参数K(trans)的比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):409-17.
6
Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.用动脉自旋标记法评估胶质肿瘤的灌注;与动态磁敏感对比法比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Oct;83(10):1914-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
7
Correlation of Tumor Immunohistochemistry with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and DSC-MRI Parameters in Patients with Gliomas.胶质瘤患者肿瘤免疫组织化学与动态对比增强及DSC-MRI参数的相关性
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Dec;37(12):2217-2223. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4908. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Enhancing fraction in glioma and its relationship to the tumoral vascular microenvironment: A dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study.增强分数与肿瘤血管微环境的关系在脑胶质瘤中的研究:动态对比增强磁共振成像研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Apr;31(4):726-31. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1925. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
9
Multimodal MRI in the characterization of glial neoplasms: the combined role of single-voxel MR spectroscopy, diffusion imaging and echo-planar perfusion imaging.多模态磁共振成像在胶质肿瘤特征描述中的应用:单体素磁共振波谱、扩散成像及回波平面灌注成像的联合作用
Neuroradiology. 2007 Oct;49(10):795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0253-x. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
10
Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected].与传统对比增强磁共振成像相比,利用动态自旋回波磁共振磁化率成像进行胶质肿瘤分级及预后预测:少突胶质细胞瘤相对脑血容量升高的混杂效应[校正后]
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Feb;25(2):214-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Differentiation between glioblastoma and solitary brain metastases using perfusion and amide proton transfer weighted MRI.使用灌注和酰胺质子转移加权磁共振成像鉴别胶质母细胞瘤与孤立性脑转移瘤
Front Neurosci. 2025 Feb 5;19:1533799. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1533799. eCollection 2025.
2
Pre-operative spinal cord perfusion quantified by DSC MRI as a predictor of post-operative prognosis in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.术前 DSC MRI 量化脊髓灌注作为颈椎脊髓病患者术后预后的预测指标。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3602-3608. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08417-0. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Velocity-Selective Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion in Monitoring High Grade Gliomas Following Therapy: Clinical Feasibility at 1.5T and Comparison with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion.速度选择性动脉自旋标记灌注成像在监测高级别胶质瘤治疗后的应用:1.5T场强下的临床可行性及与动态磁敏感对比灌注成像的比较
Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 25;14(2):126. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14020126.
4
The Role of Multimodal Imaging in Differentiating Vasogenic from Infiltrative Edema: A Systematic Review.多模态成像在区分血管源性水肿与浸润性水肿中的作用:一项系统评价
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2023 Aug 21;33(4):514-521. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772466. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Hemodynamic Imaging in Cerebral Diffuse Glioma-Part A: Concept, Differential Diagnosis and Tumor Grading.脑弥漫性胶质瘤的血流动力学成像——A部分:概念、鉴别诊断及肿瘤分级
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 10;14(6):1432. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061432.
6
Three-Dimensional Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling Parameters Distinguish Pediatric Medulloblastoma and Pilocytic Astrocytoma.三维伪连续动脉自旋标记参数可区分儿童髓母细胞瘤和毛细胞型星形细胞瘤。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Mar 2;8:598190. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.598190. eCollection 2020.
7
Comparison of amide proton transfer imaging and magnetization transfer imaging in revealing glioma grades and proliferative activities: a histogram analysis.酰胺质子转移成像与磁化传递成像在显示脑胶质瘤分级和增殖活性中的对比:直方图分析。
Neuroradiology. 2021 May;63(5):685-693. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02547-0. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
8
The diagnostic value of quantitative analysis of ASL, DSC-MRI and DKI in the grading of cerebral gliomas: a meta-analysis.动脉自旋标记(ASL)、动态对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)和扩散峰度成像(DKI)定量分析在脑胶质瘤分级中的诊断价值:一项Meta分析
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Aug 24;15(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01643-y.
9
An Efficient Framework for Accurate Arterial Input Selection in DSC-MRI of Glioma Brain Tumors.一种用于脑胶质瘤DSC-MRI中准确动脉输入选择的高效框架。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019 Feb 1;9(1):69-80. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
Radiomics based on multicontrast MRI can precisely differentiate among glioma subtypes and predict tumour-proliferative behaviour.多对比度 MRI 影像组学可精准区分胶质瘤亚型并预测肿瘤增殖行为。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1986-1996. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5704-8. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Grading of CNS neoplasms using continuous arterial spin labeled perfusion MR imaging at 3 Tesla.在3特斯拉场强下使用连续动脉自旋标记灌注磁共振成像对中枢神经系统肿瘤进行分级。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Oct;22(4):475-82. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20415.
2
Differentiation of low-grade oligodendrogliomas from low-grade astrocytomas by using quantitative blood-volume measurements derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging.通过使用基于动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像得出的定量血容量测量值来鉴别低级别少突胶质细胞瘤与低级别星形细胞瘤。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Feb;26(2):266-73.
3
Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas.人体胶质瘤血管通透性和血容量测定方法的比较研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Nov;20(5):748-57. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20182.
4
Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.通过动态磁敏感对比增强灌注磁共振成像比较脑血容量和血管通透性与胶质瘤分级的关系。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 May;25(5):746-55.
5
Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T(2)*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI.通过动态T(2)*加权对比增强磁共振成像测量血容量和血管转运常数。
Magn Reson Med. 2004 May;51(5):961-8. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20049.
6
Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected].与传统对比增强磁共振成像相比,利用动态自旋回波磁共振磁化率成像进行胶质肿瘤分级及预后预测:少突胶质细胞瘤相对脑血容量升高的混杂效应[校正后]
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Feb;25(2):214-21.
7
Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging.胶质瘤分级:与传统磁共振成像相比,灌注磁共振成像和质子磁共振波谱成像的敏感性、特异性及预测价值
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003 Nov-Dec;24(10):1989-98.
8
Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging.脑肿瘤血流定量分析:动脉自旋标记与动态磁敏感加权对比增强磁共振成像的比较
Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):523-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2282020409. Epub 2003 Jun 20.
9
Imaging of angiogenesis: from microscope to clinic.血管生成的成像:从显微镜到临床。
Nat Med. 2003 Jun;9(6):713-25. doi: 10.1038/nm0603-713.
10
Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging.利用磁共振成像进行脑灌注成像时动脉输入函数的自动计算。
Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):593-600. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020092. Epub 2003 Mar 27.

使用动态磁敏感对比增强灌注磁共振成像,比较从单室获得的灌注指标与药代动力学建模方法在不同胶质瘤分级中的应用。

Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade.

作者信息

Law M, Young R, Babb J, Rad M, Sasaki T, Zagzag D, Johnson G

机构信息

Department of Radiology, NYU Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Oct;27(9):1975-82.

PMID:17032878
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7977890/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Numerous different parameters measured by perfusion MR imaging can be used for characterizing gliomas. Parameters derived from 3 different analyses were correlated with histopathologically confirmed grade in gliomas to determine which parameters best predict tumor grade.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with gliomas underwent dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DSC MR imaging). Data were analyzed by 3 different algorithms. Analysis 1 estimated relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) by using a single compartment model. Analysis 2 estimated fractional plasma volume (V(p)) and vascular transfer constant (K(trans)) by using a 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Analysis 3 estimated absolute cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and mean transit time (MTT) by using a single compartment model and an automated arterial input function. The Mann-Whitney U test was used make pairwise comparisons. Binary logistic regression was used to assess whether rCBV, V(p), K(trans), CBV, CBF, and MTT can discriminate high- from low-grade tumors.

RESULTS

rCBV was the best discriminator of tumor grade ype, followed by CBF, CBV, and K(trans). Spearman rank correlation factors were the following: rCBV = 0.812 (P < .0001), CBF = 0.677 (P < .0001), CBV = 0.604 (P < .0001), K(trans) = 0.457 (P < .0001), V(p) = 0.301 (P =.009), and MTT = 0.089 (P = .448). rCBV was the best single predictor, and K(trans) with rCBV was the best set of predictors of high-grade glioma.

CONCLUSION

rCBV, CBF, CBV K(trans), and V(p) measurements correlated well with histopathologic grade. rCBV was the best predictor of glioma grade, and the combination of rCBV with K(trans) was the best set of metrics to predict glioma grade.

摘要

背景与目的

灌注磁共振成像测量的众多不同参数可用于胶质瘤的特征描述。源自3种不同分析的参数与胶质瘤组织病理学确诊分级相关,以确定哪些参数能最佳预测肿瘤分级。

方法

74例胶质瘤患者接受了动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)。数据采用3种不同算法进行分析。分析1使用单室模型估计相对脑血容量(rCBV)。分析2使用双室药代动力学模型估计血浆分数容积(V(p))和血管转运常数(K(trans))。分析3使用单室模型和自动动脉输入函数估计绝对脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)和平均通过时间(MTT)。采用曼-惠特尼U检验进行两两比较。二元逻辑回归用于评估rCBV、V(p)、K(trans)、CBV、CBF和MTT能否区分高级别与低级别肿瘤。

结果

rCBV是肿瘤分级类型的最佳判别指标,其次是CBF、CBV和K(trans)。Spearman等级相关系数如下:rCBV = 0.812(P <.0001),CBF = 0.677(P <.0001),CBV = 0.604(P <.0001),K(trans) = 0.457(P <.0001),V(p) = 0.301(P =.009),MTT = 0.089(P =.448)。rCBV是最佳的单一预测指标,K(trans)与rCBV组合是高级别胶质瘤的最佳预测指标集。

结论

rCBV、CBF、CBV、K(trans)和V(p)测量值与组织病理学分级相关性良好。rCBV是胶质瘤分级的最佳预测指标,rCBV与K(trans)的组合是预测胶质瘤分级的最佳指标集。