Gerszten Peter C, Welch William C
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, Pa., USA.
Prog Neurol Surg. 2006;19:135-151. doi: 10.1159/000095188.
Minimally invasive spine surgery decompression, arthrodesis, and instrumentation techniques are now being applied in a wide variety of percutaneous, laparoscopic and minimal access procedures. There is currently little longitudinal long-term data on these procedures to document their efficacy, indications, limitations or complications as compared to standard open techniques. Further complicating such direct comparisons is that widely used spine outcomes instruments often do not capture the relative benefits of these new procedures. It is only through randomized trials that the potential benefits of these procedures be substantiated in order to justify the sometimes significant increased costs associated with them.
微创脊柱手术减压、关节融合和内固定技术目前正应用于各种经皮、腹腔镜和微创入路手术中。与标准开放技术相比,目前关于这些手术的纵向长期数据很少,无法记录其疗效、适应症、局限性或并发症。使这种直接比较更加复杂的是,广泛使用的脊柱疗效评估工具往往无法体现这些新手术的相对优势。只有通过随机试验,这些手术的潜在益处才能得到证实,以证明与之相关的有时显著增加的成本是合理的。