• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在保护措施下进行颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。技术、结果及局限性。

Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. Techniques, results and limitations.

作者信息

Henry M, Polydorou A, Henry I, Anagnostopoulou I S, Polydorou I A, Hugel M

机构信息

Clinic of Cardiology, Nancy, France.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Oct;47(5):519-46.

PMID:17033601
Abstract

A carotid stenosis is responsible for about 30% of strokes occurring. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered to be the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is emerging as a new alternative treatment for a carotid artery stenosis, but the risk of neurological complications and brain embolism remains the major drawback to this procedure. Therefore, in order to reduce the risks, we need: 1) good indications, good patient and lesion selection; 2) correct techniques; 3) brain protection devices (cerebral protection devices should be routinely used and are mandatory for any procedure); 4) 3 types of protection devices are available, but filters are the most commonly used (all protection devices have limitations and cannot prevent from all embolic events; however, neurological complications can be reduced by 60%); 5) a good choice of the stent and correct implantation (all stents are not equivalent and have different geometrical effects); 6) pharmacological adjuncts; 7) a good team. Recent studies have shown that CAS has superior short-term outcomes than CEA in high surgical risk patients, but there are enough reported data to conclude that CAS is also not inferior to CEA in low-risk patients. CAS under protection is the standard of care and is maybe becoming the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis at least in some subgroups of patients.

摘要

约30%的中风是由颈动脉狭窄引起的。颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)被认为是治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)正作为一种治疗颈动脉狭窄的新的替代方法出现,但神经并发症和脑栓塞的风险仍然是该手术的主要缺点。因此,为降低风险,我们需要:1)明确的适应症,对患者和病变进行良好的选择;2)正确的技术;3)脑保护装置(脑保护装置应常规使用,对任何手术都是必需的);4)有3种类型的保护装置可用,但滤网是最常用的(所有保护装置都有局限性,不能预防所有栓塞事件;然而,神经并发症可减少60%);5)对支架进行良好的选择并正确植入(并非所有支架都等效,具有不同的几何效应);6)药物辅助;7)一个优秀的团队。最近的研究表明,在高手术风险患者中,CAS的短期疗效优于CEA,但有足够的报道数据表明,在低风险患者中,CAS也不逊色于CEA。在保护措施下进行CAS是治疗的标准,至少在某些患者亚组中可能正成为治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。

相似文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. Techniques, results and limitations.在保护措施下进行颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。技术、结果及局限性。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Oct;47(5):519-46.
2
Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art.在保护措施下的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。最新技术水平。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Feb;55(1):19-56.
3
Initial experience with cerebral protection devices to prevent embolization during carotid artery stenting.颈动脉支架置入术中使用脑保护装置预防栓塞的初步经验。
J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec;36(6):1175-85. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.129488.
4
Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection: advantages and drawbacks.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008 Sep;5(5):591-603. doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.5.591.
5
Carotid angioplasty and stenting: how to avoid complications.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Feb;57(1):29-56.
6
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.动脉内膜切除术或颈动脉支架置入术:探索仍在继续。
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
7
Controversies in carotid stenting.颈动脉支架置入术的争议
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;37(2):79-87. doi: 10.1177/153857440303700201.
8
Carotid artery stenting for stroke prevention.颈动脉支架置入术预防脑卒中。
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Jan;30(1):22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Assessment of short-term outcomes for protected carotid angioplasty with stents using recent evidence.利用最新证据评估带支架的颈动脉血管成形术的短期疗效。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Dec;42(6):1094-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.08.020.
10
A comparison of carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection versus carotid endarterectomy under local anesthesia.局部麻醉下颈动脉支架置入术联合神经保护与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
Am J Surg. 2005 Nov;190(5):696-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.005.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rat Carotid Artery Pressure-Controlled Segmental Balloon Injury with Periadventitial Therapeutic Application.一种用于大鼠颈动脉的压力控制节段性球囊损伤及外膜周围治疗应用。
J Vis Exp. 2020 Jul 9(161). doi: 10.3791/60473.
2
Protected versus Unprotected Carotid Artery Stenting : Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.颈动脉支架置入术:有保护装置与无保护装置的比较——当前文献的荟萃分析
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Jul;61(4):458-466. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.001. Epub 2018 Apr 10.