• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在保护措施下的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。最新技术水平。

Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art.

作者信息

Henry M, Polydorou A, Klonaris C, Henry I, Polydorou A D, Hugel M

机构信息

Cabinet de Cardiologie, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Feb;55(1):19-56.

PMID:17287680
Abstract

A carotid stenosis is responsible for about 30% of strokes occurring. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered to be the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is emerging as a new alternative treatment for a carotid artery stenosis, but the risk of neurological complications and brain embolism remain the major drawback to this procedure. So as to reduce the risk, we need: good indications, good patient and lesion selection; correct techniques; brain protection devices (cerebral protection devices should be routinely used and are mandatory for any procedure. Three types of protection devices are available: filters are the most commonly used. Nevertheless, all protection devices have limitations and cannot prevent from embolic events. However neurological complications can be reduced by 60%. New protection devices will be discussed); good choice of the stent and correct implantation (all stents are not equivalent and have different geometrical effects); pharmacological adjuncts; good team. Indications are well accepted for high-risk patients and recent studies have shown that CAS has superior short-term outcomes than CEA in this group of patients. Indications for low-risk and asymptomatic patients are controversial. New selection criteria have to be discussed. But there are enough reported data to conclude that CAS is also not inferior to CEA in low-risk and asymptomatic patients. In our series of 844 procedures, without protection (n = 187) 30-day death and stroke rate was 3.7% and with protection (n = 657) 1% (1.3% for symptomatic patients, 0.9% for asymptomatic patients, 1.4% in high-risk patients, 0.4% in low-risk patients). CAS under protection is the standard of care and is maybe becoming the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis at least in some subgroups of patients.

摘要

约30%的中风由颈动脉狭窄引起。颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)被认为是治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)正在成为治疗颈动脉狭窄的一种新的替代疗法,但神经并发症和脑栓塞风险仍是该手术的主要缺点。为降低风险,我们需要:明确的适应症、合适的患者和病变选择;正确的技术;脑保护装置(应常规使用脑保护装置,且任何手术都必须使用。有三种类型的保护装置可供选择:滤网是最常用的。然而,所有保护装置都有局限性,无法预防栓塞事件。不过,神经并发症可减少60%。将讨论新型保护装置);支架的良好选择和正确植入(并非所有支架都等效,且具有不同的几何效应);药物辅助;优秀的团队。对于高危患者,适应症已被广泛接受,最近的研究表明,在这类患者中,CAS的短期疗效优于CEA。低风险和无症状患者的适应症存在争议。必须讨论新的选择标准。但有足够的报告数据可以得出结论,在低风险和无症状患者中,CAS也不逊色于CEA。在我们的844例手术系列中,未使用保护装置(n = 187)时,30天死亡率和中风率为3.7%,使用保护装置(n = 657)时为1%(有症状患者为1.3%,无症状患者为0.9%,高危患者为1.4%,低风险患者为0.4%)。在保护装置下进行CAS是治疗的标准,至少在某些患者亚组中可能正在成为治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。

相似文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. State of the art.在保护措施下的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。最新技术水平。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Feb;55(1):19-56.
2
Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection. Techniques, results and limitations.在保护措施下进行颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。技术、结果及局限性。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Oct;47(5):519-46.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting under protection: advantages and drawbacks.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008 Sep;5(5):591-603. doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.5.591.
4
Carotid angioplasty and stenting: how to avoid complications.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Feb;57(1):29-56.
5
The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting.CAPTURE注册研究:早期批准后使用栓子保护装置对高手术风险患者进行颈动脉支架置入术的预后预测因素。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Dec 1;70(7):1025-33. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21359.
6
Carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients.外科手术高危患者的颈动脉支架置入术。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):513-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20640.
7
Safety and efficacy of carotid stenting in the very elderly.高龄患者颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr 1;75(5):651-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22345.
8
Carotid angioplasty and stenting, success relies on appropriate patient selection.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术,成功与否取决于合适的患者选择。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 May;47(5):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.12.049.
9
Carotid revascularization outcomes comparing distal filters, flow reversal, and endarterectomy.比较远端滤器、血流逆转和内膜切除术的颈动脉血运重建结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Oct;54(4):1000-4; discussion 1004-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.03.279. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
10
Treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery disease: similar early outcomes after carotid stenting for high-risk patients and endarterectomy for standard-risk patients.无症状性颈动脉疾病的治疗:高危患者行颈动脉支架置入术与标准风险患者行内膜切除术的早期结局相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 May;43(5):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Carotid plaque volume in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术患者的颈动脉斑块体积。
Br J Surg. 2018 Feb;105(3):262-269. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10670. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
2
Carotid artery stenting: a single-centre experience with up to 8 years' follow-up.颈动脉支架置入术:单中心 8 年随访经验。
Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr;19(4):982-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1207-3. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
3
Carotid artery stenting: findings based on 8 years' experience.颈动脉支架置入术:基于8年经验的研究结果
Radiol Med. 2009 Feb;114(1):95-110. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0326-x. Epub 2008 Sep 26.