Henry M, Polydorou A, Klonaris C, Henry I, Polydorou A D, Hugel M
Cabinet de Cardiologie, Nancy, France.
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007 Feb;55(1):19-56.
A carotid stenosis is responsible for about 30% of strokes occurring. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is considered to be the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis. Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is emerging as a new alternative treatment for a carotid artery stenosis, but the risk of neurological complications and brain embolism remain the major drawback to this procedure. So as to reduce the risk, we need: good indications, good patient and lesion selection; correct techniques; brain protection devices (cerebral protection devices should be routinely used and are mandatory for any procedure. Three types of protection devices are available: filters are the most commonly used. Nevertheless, all protection devices have limitations and cannot prevent from embolic events. However neurological complications can be reduced by 60%. New protection devices will be discussed); good choice of the stent and correct implantation (all stents are not equivalent and have different geometrical effects); pharmacological adjuncts; good team. Indications are well accepted for high-risk patients and recent studies have shown that CAS has superior short-term outcomes than CEA in this group of patients. Indications for low-risk and asymptomatic patients are controversial. New selection criteria have to be discussed. But there are enough reported data to conclude that CAS is also not inferior to CEA in low-risk and asymptomatic patients. In our series of 844 procedures, without protection (n = 187) 30-day death and stroke rate was 3.7% and with protection (n = 657) 1% (1.3% for symptomatic patients, 0.9% for asymptomatic patients, 1.4% in high-risk patients, 0.4% in low-risk patients). CAS under protection is the standard of care and is maybe becoming the gold standard treatment of a carotid stenosis at least in some subgroups of patients.
约30%的中风由颈动脉狭窄引起。颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)被认为是治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)正在成为治疗颈动脉狭窄的一种新的替代疗法,但神经并发症和脑栓塞风险仍是该手术的主要缺点。为降低风险,我们需要:明确的适应症、合适的患者和病变选择;正确的技术;脑保护装置(应常规使用脑保护装置,且任何手术都必须使用。有三种类型的保护装置可供选择:滤网是最常用的。然而,所有保护装置都有局限性,无法预防栓塞事件。不过,神经并发症可减少60%。将讨论新型保护装置);支架的良好选择和正确植入(并非所有支架都等效,且具有不同的几何效应);药物辅助;优秀的团队。对于高危患者,适应症已被广泛接受,最近的研究表明,在这类患者中,CAS的短期疗效优于CEA。低风险和无症状患者的适应症存在争议。必须讨论新的选择标准。但有足够的报告数据可以得出结论,在低风险和无症状患者中,CAS也不逊色于CEA。在我们的844例手术系列中,未使用保护装置(n = 187)时,30天死亡率和中风率为3.7%,使用保护装置(n = 657)时为1%(有症状患者为1.3%,无症状患者为0.9%,高危患者为1.4%,低风险患者为0.4%)。在保护装置下进行CAS是治疗的标准,至少在某些患者亚组中可能正在成为治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。