• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康记录在美国的普及程度如何?证据总结。

How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.

作者信息

Jha Ashish K, Ferris Timothy G, Donelan Karen, DesRoches Catherine, Shields Alexandra, Rosenbaum Sara, Blumenthal David

机构信息

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w496-507. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496
PMID:17035341
Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) are promising tools to improve quality and efficiency in health care, but data on their adoption rate are limited. We identified surveys on EHR adoption and assessed their quality. Although surveys returned widely different estimates of EHR use, when available information is limited to studies of high or medium quality, national estimates are possible: Through 2005, approximately 23.9 percent of physicians used EHRs in the ambulatory setting, while 5 percent of hospitals used computerized physician order entry. Large gaps in knowledge, including information about EHR use among safety-net providers, pose critical challenges for the development of policies aimed at speeding adoption.

摘要

电子健康记录(EHRs)是有望提高医疗保健质量和效率的工具,但关于其采用率的数据有限。我们识别了有关EHR采用情况的调查并评估了其质量。尽管各项调查得出的EHR使用估计值差异很大,但当可获取的信息仅限于高质量或中等质量的研究时,就有可能得出全国性的估计值:截至2005年,约23.9%的医生在门诊环境中使用EHRs,而5%的医院使用计算机化医嘱录入系统。知识方面存在巨大差距,包括安全网提供者中有关EHR使用的信息,这对旨在加速采用的政策制定构成了严峻挑战。

相似文献

1
How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence.电子健康记录在美国的普及程度如何?证据总结。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w496-507. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w496. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
2
Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them?电子健康记录:哪些医疗机构拥有它们,临床医生又是如何使用它们的?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Feb;14(1):43-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00787.x.
3
Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey.社区卫生中心采用健康信息技术:一项全国性调查的结果
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1373-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1373.
4
Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians.门诊医疗中的电子健康记录——一项针对医生的全国性调查。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):50-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0802005. Epub 2008 Jun 18.
5
Ambulatory electronic medical records for large practices.大型医疗机构的门诊电子病历。
Healthc Q. 2008;11(1):122-5.
6
Diffusion of electronic health records--six years of empirical data.电子健康记录的传播——六年实证数据
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):963-7.
7
The value of electronic health records in community health centers: policy implications.社区卫生中心电子健康记录的价值:政策影响
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):206-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.206.
8
Are there patient disparities when electronic health records are adopted?采用电子健康记录时是否存在患者差异?
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009 May;20(2):473-88. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0143.
9
Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey.医生与电子健康记录:一项全州范围的调查。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):507-12. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.507.
10
Market effects on electronic health record adoption by physicians.市场对医生采用电子健康记录的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2008 Jul-Sep;33(3):243-52. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000324904.19272.c2.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying relevant medical reports from an assorted report collection using the multinomial naïve Bayes classifier and the UMLS.使用多项式朴素贝叶斯分类器和统一医学语言系统(UMLS)从各种报告集合中识别相关医学报告。
Indian J Med Inform. 2007;2(1).
2
Patterns of health information exchange strategies underlying health information technologies capabilities building.健康信息技术能力建设背后的健康信息交换策略模式。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2021 Jul 16;11(3):211-231. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2021.1952113. eCollection 2022.
3
Emerging digital technologies in cancer treatment, prevention, and control.
癌症治疗、预防和控制中的新兴数字技术。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):2009-2017. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab033.
4
Adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in China During the Past 10 Years: Consecutive Survey Data Analysis and Comparison of Sino-American Challenges and Experiences.过去 10 年中国电子健康记录(EHRs)的采用:中美挑战与经验的连续调查数据分析与比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 18;23(2):e24813. doi: 10.2196/24813.
5
A Case Study of a Point-of-Care Electronic Medical Record [SABER] in Totonicapán, Guatemala: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions. Guatemalteca de punto de atención electrónico de historias clínicas [SABER]: beneficios, desafíos y futuras orientaciones.
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Sep 24;86(1):122. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3041.
6
The Feasibility and Utility of a Personal Health Record for Persons With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers for Web-Based Care Coordination: Mixed Methods Study.个人健康记录对痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者进行基于网络的护理协调的可行性和效用:混合方法研究
JMIR Aging. 2020 Jun 26;3(1):e17769. doi: 10.2196/17769.
7
A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model in Health Informatics.健康信息学中技术接受模型的系统评价
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jul;9(3):604-634. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668091. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
8
A Practical Risk Stratification Approach for Implementing a Primary Care Chronic Disease Management Program in an Underserved Community.一种在服务欠缺社区实施初级保健慢性病管理项目的实用风险分层方法。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):202-213. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0014.
9
Analysis of the factors influencing healthcare professionals' adoption of mobile electronic medical record (EMR) using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in a tertiary hospital.在一家三级医院中,运用技术接受与使用统一理论(UTAUT)分析影响医疗保健专业人员采用移动电子病历(EMR)的因素。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jan 30;16:12. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0249-8.
10
Discovering Multi-Scale Co-Occurrence Patterns of Asthma and Influenza with Oak Ridge Bio-Surveillance Toolkit.利用橡树岭生物监测工具包发现哮喘和流感的多尺度共现模式。
Front Public Health. 2015 Aug 3;3:182. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00182. eCollection 2015.