Suppr超能文献

非典型抗精神病药物在阿尔茨海默病患者中的疗效。

Effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Schneider Lon S, Tariot Pierre N, Dagerman Karen S, Davis Sonia M, Hsiao John K, Ismail M Saleem, Lebowitz Barry D, Lyketsos Constantine G, Ryan J Michael, Stroup T Scott, Sultzer David L, Weintraub Daniel, Lieberman Jeffrey A

机构信息

Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 12;355(15):1525-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061240.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic drugs are widely used to treat psychosis, aggression, and agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease, but their benefits are uncertain and concerns about safety have emerged. We assessed the effectiveness of atypical antipsychotic drugs in outpatients with Alzheimer's disease.

METHODS

In this 42-site, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 421 outpatients with Alzheimer's disease and psychosis, aggression, or agitation were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine (mean dose, 5.5 mg per day), quetiapine (mean dose, 56.5 mg per day), risperidone (mean dose, 1.0 mg per day), or placebo. Doses were adjusted as needed, and patients were followed for up to 36 weeks. The main outcomes were the time from initial treatment to the discontinuation of treatment for any reason and the number of patients with at least minimal improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) scale at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among treatments with regard to the time to the discontinuation of treatment for any reason: olanzapine (median, 8.1 weeks), quetiapine (median, 5.3 weeks), risperidone (median, 7.4 weeks), and placebo (median, 8.0 weeks) (P=0.52). The median time to the discontinuation of treatment due to a lack of efficacy favored olanzapine (22.1 weeks) and risperidone (26.7 weeks) as compared with quetiapine (9.1 weeks) and placebo (9.0 weeks) (P=0.002). The time to the discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events or intolerability favored placebo. Overall, 24% of patients who received olanzapine, 16% of patients who received quetiapine, 18% of patients who received risperidone, and 5% of patients who received placebo discontinued their assigned treatment owing to intolerability (P=0.009). No significant differences were noted among the groups with regard to improvement on the CGIC scale. Improvement was observed in 32% of patients assigned to olanzapine, 26% of patients assigned to quetiapine, 29% of patients assigned to risperidone, and 21% of patients assigned to placebo (P=0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse effects offset advantages in the efficacy of atypical antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of psychosis, aggression, or agitation in patients with Alzheimer's disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00015548 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

摘要

背景

第二代(非典型)抗精神病药物被广泛用于治疗阿尔茨海默病患者的精神病、攻击行为和激越症状,但它们的益处尚不确定,且已出现对安全性的担忧。我们评估了非典型抗精神病药物在阿尔茨海默病门诊患者中的有效性。

方法

在这项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,421例患有精神病、攻击行为或激越症状的阿尔茨海默病门诊患者被随机分配接受奥氮平(平均剂量,每日5.5毫克)、喹硫平(平均剂量,每日56.5毫克)、利培酮(平均剂量,每日1.0毫克)或安慰剂。根据需要调整剂量,对患者随访长达36周。主要结局为从初始治疗至因任何原因停药的时间,以及在第12周时临床总体印象变化量表(CGIC)上至少有最小改善的患者数量。

结果

在因任何原因停药时间方面,各治疗组之间无显著差异:奥氮平(中位数,8.1周)、喹硫平(中位数,5.3周)、利培酮(中位数,7.4周)和安慰剂(中位数,8.0周)(P = 0.52)。与喹硫平(9.1周)和安慰剂(9.0周)相比,因缺乏疗效导致停药的中位时间奥氮平(22.1周)和利培酮(26.7周)更具优势(P = 0.002)。因不良事件或不耐受导致停药的时间安慰剂组更具优势。总体而言,接受奥氮平治疗的患者中有24%、接受喹硫平治疗的患者中有16%、接受利培酮治疗的患者中有18%以及接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有5%因不耐受而停用了分配的治疗(P = 0.009)。在CGIC量表改善方面,各组之间未观察到显著差异。分配接受奥氮平治疗的患者中有32%、接受喹硫平治疗的患者中有26%、接受利培酮治疗的患者中有29%以及接受安慰剂治疗的患者中有21%出现改善(P = 0.22)。

结论

不良反应抵消了非典型抗精神病药物在治疗阿尔茨海默病患者的精神病、攻击行为或激越症状方面的疗效优势。(临床试验注册号,NCT00015548 [ClinicalTrials.gov]。)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验