McGrath B P, Matthews P G, Louis W, Howes L, Whitworth J A, Kincaid-Smith P S, Fraser I, Scheinkestel C, MacDonald G, Rallings M
Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Prince Henry's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990 Nov;16(5):831-8. doi: 10.1097/00005344-199011000-00021.
Sixty-one patients (41 men, 20 women) aged 29-73 years, with moderate to severe hypertension, were enrolled in a multicentre study to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of dilevalol (D) and captopril (C). At the end of the baseline period, supine diastolic blood pressure (SuDBP) was 105-140 mm Hg on hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg once daily and placebo t.i.d. Patients were randomly assigned to D + HCTZ (n = 29) or C + HCTZ (n = 32) and entered phase II titration of D (100-800 mg b.i.d.) or C (12.5 mg b.i.d. to 50 mg t.i.d.). If SuDBP was greater than 99 mm Hg, hydralazine was added (25 mg once daily to 50 mg b.i.d.). If SuDBP was less than or equal to 99 mm Hg, patients entered phase III, a 3-month maintenance period. Demographic profiles were not significantly different between the two groups. Baseline supine BP (mean +/- SEM) was similar in the two groups (D + HCTZ: 182 +/- 3/112 +/- 1; C + HCTZ: 179 +/- 4/113 +/- 1 mm Hg), as was baseline standing BP (D + HCTZ: 175 +/- 3/114 +/- 2; C +/- HCTZ: 173 +/- 4/113 +/- 1 mm Hg). At the end of phase II, there were no significant differences between treatments with respect to the changes in BP from baseline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
61例年龄在29至73岁之间、患有中度至重度高血压的患者(41名男性,20名女性)参与了一项多中心研究,以比较双醋洛尔(D)和卡托普利(C)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。在基线期结束时,患者每日服用一次25mg氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)和每日三次安慰剂,仰卧位舒张压(SuDBP)为105 - 140mmHg。患者被随机分配至D + HCTZ组(n = 29)或C + HCTZ组(n = 32),并进入D(100 - 800mg,每日两次)或C(12.5mg,每日两次至50mg,每日三次)的II期滴定阶段。如果SuDBP大于99mmHg,则添加肼屈嗪(每日一次25mg至每日两次50mg)。如果SuDBP小于或等于99mmHg,患者进入III期,即3个月的维持期。两组的人口统计学特征无显著差异。两组的基线仰卧位血压(平均值±标准误)相似(D + HCTZ组:182±3/112±1;C + HCTZ组:179±4/113±1mmHg),基线站立位血压也相似(D + HCTZ组:175±3/114±2;C + HCTZ组:173±4/113±1mmHg)。在II期结束时,各治疗组与基线相比的血压变化无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)