Bromage D I
Centre for Ethics in Medicine, 73 St Michael's Hill, Bristol, BS2 8BH, UK.
Med Humanit. 2006 Jun;32(1):38-42. doi: 10.1136/jmh.2004.000208.
There is a growing trend in obstetric medicine of prenatal diagnosis and the selective abortion of foetuses that are likely to be born with a disability. Reasons commonly given to explain this trend include the financial implications of screening and testing policies, the disruption to families caused by the birth of a child with a disability, and the potential quality of life of the unborn child. This paper reflects upon another possible reason for this. It is argued that it is, in part, a consequence of our attitudes towards disability and a pursuit of aesthetic perfection. These attitudes arise from a social context that may be explained by considering the effect on the disabled community of the transition from modernity to postmodernity. This shift is demonstrated by inspecting some of the synonymous developments in art history. It is suggested that this "cultural turn" may have both helped and hindered people with disabilities, but the hypothesis requires further testing. This could best be achieved with a qualitative study of what motivates parental decision making in the obstetric unit.
在产科医学领域,产前诊断以及对可能患有残疾的胎儿进行选择性流产的趋势日益增长。通常用来解释这一趋势的理由包括筛查和检测政策的经济影响、残疾儿童出生对家庭造成的困扰,以及未出生胎儿潜在的生活质量。本文思考了这一趋势的另一个可能原因。有人认为,这在一定程度上是我们对残疾的态度以及对审美完美追求的结果。这些态度源于一种社会背景,通过考虑从现代性向后现代性转变对残疾人群体的影响或许可以对此加以解释。通过审视艺术史上的一些同步发展可以证明这种转变。有人提出,这种“文化转向”可能对残疾人既有帮助也有阻碍,但这一假设需要进一步验证。对此,最好通过对产科病房中促使父母做出决策的因素进行定性研究来实现。