Live and let die? Disability in bioethics.
作者信息
Vehmas Simo
机构信息
Department of Social and Moral Philosophy, PO Box 9, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
出版信息
New Rev Bioeth. 2003 Nov;1(1):145-57. doi: 10.1080/1740028032000131486.
PMID:15706681
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Live and let die? Disability in bioethics.
New Rev Bioeth. 2003 Nov;1(1):145-57. doi: 10.1080/1740028032000131486.
2
The moral implications of prenatal genetic testing.
Penn Bioeth J. 2006 Spring;2(2):13-6.
3
Interventions in the human genome.
Mod Law Rev. 1998 Sep;61(5):681-96. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00173.
4
Genetic counselling: ethical mediation of eugenic futures?
Futures. 2000 Nov-Dec;32(9-10):853-65. doi: 10.1016/s0016-3287(00)00035-5.
5
Disability equality and prenatal testing: contradictory or compatible?
Fla State Univ Law Rev. 2003 Winter;30(2):315-42.
6
Social and ethical challenges of prenatal diagnosis.
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass). 2000 Winter:1-2, 8.
7
Bioethics and the law--the impact of genetic technology on prenatal management.
E Law. 1995 Dec;2(3):E9.
8
Social and ethical problems of fetal diagnosis and screening.
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 1989 Jul-Sep;7(3):171-85. doi: 10.1080/02646838908403590.
9
The expressivist objection to prenatal diagnosis: can it be laid to rest?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):24-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.019984.
10
Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion: a result of the cultural turn?
Med Humanit. 2006 Jun;32(1):38-42. doi: 10.1136/jmh.2004.000208.
引用本文的文献
1
Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.
J Genet Couns. 2018 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0265-1.
Zotero 插件