Butterwick Dale J, Paskevich David M, Lagumen Niko G, Vallevand Andrea L C, Lafave Mark R
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 1N4.
J Allied Health. 2006 Fall;35(3):147-55.
The content validity of technical skill assessment instruments (TSAI) for the skills of athletic taping has not been reported. The purpose of this paper is to outline and present the process of content validation for nine TSAIs for athletic taping. Local and national validators were selected from Canadian Athletic Therapists' Association (CATA)-accredited athletic therapy (AT) programs to serve as content validators.
The process of content validation began with the creation of a detailed task analysis via mail and simple validation by local validators. Subsequently, the detailed task analysis was committee validated by a group of 10 validators from across Canada. Validators judged the importance and difficulty of each item, and a face-to-face committee-validator meeting established consensus on the majority of checklist items. Through a modified Ebel procedure, frequency distribution was used in the formation of the final TSAIs.
Initial consensus for pre-taping assessment and technical skill performance items was low. Upon committee discussion and lack of agreement, the decision to remove pretaping assessment items was made. Initial results of importance and difficulty for athletic taping technical skills were low prior to the committee meeting. Results of importance and difficulty improved substantially following the face-to-face committee-validators meeting. Consensus on fail points improved from initial to final committee validation.
The process of simple and committee validation can be seen as effective methods to establish the content validity of instruments used for the evaluation of athletic taping.
尚未有关于运动贴扎技术技能评估工具(TSAI)内容效度的报道。本文旨在概述并呈现九种运动贴扎TSAI的内容效度验证过程。从加拿大运动治疗师协会(CATA)认可的运动治疗(AT)项目中挑选了本地和全国的验证者作为内容验证者。
内容效度验证过程始于通过邮件创建详细的任务分析,并由本地验证者进行简单验证。随后,由来自加拿大各地的10名验证者组成的委员会对详细任务分析进行验证。验证者对每个项目的重要性和难度进行评判,并且通过面对面的委员会验证者会议就大多数清单项目达成了共识。通过修改后的埃贝尔程序,在最终TSAI的形成过程中使用了频率分布。
贴扎前评估和技术技能表现项目的初步共识较低。经过委员会讨论且未达成一致后,决定删除贴扎前评估项目。在委员会会议之前,运动贴扎技术技能的重要性和难度的初步结果较低。在面对面的委员会验证者会议之后,重要性和难度的结果有了显著改善。从最初到最终的委员会验证,对失败点的共识有所提高。
简单验证和委员会验证过程可被视为确立用于评估运动贴扎的工具内容效度的有效方法。