Chang Kuang-Yi, Chang Wen-Kuei, Chang Wan-Ling, Lin Su-Man, Chan Kwok-Hon, Sung Chun-Sung, Tsou Mei-Yung
Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan, ROC.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2006 Sep;44(3):153-9.
Opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) has been used widely and effectively after spine surgery. The untoward effects of intravenous opioids could vary with the drug and dose applied. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, might be devoid of the adverse effects which the traditional opioids have. We conducted this prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine for intravenous PCA after spine surgery.
Fifty patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal fusion were randomly assigned to either buprenorphine or morphine group. PCA was administered in a double-blind manner for a 2-day postoperative course. The evaluation was initiated after patients were transferred to the post-anesthetic care unit. Pain assessment with visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and after pain elicitation by sitting was carried out and recorded at 6, 24, 48 hrs after surgery. Untoward effects were also collected.
Twenty-five patients were randomized to each group. One patient in the buprenorphine group dropped out from the study due to dizziness. There was no difference between the groups with respect to the baseline variables. The VAS scores at rest and after elicitation of pain by sitting showed no difference between both groups. The delivered volume of buprenorphine, the numbers of demand and delivery, and the demand/delivery ratio were higher in buprenorphine than morphine group at 6 hr after surgery but were not different later. No major complications occurred in both groups. The pruritus incidence in buprenorphine group was significantly lower than in morphine group (0 vs. 24%, P = 0.02). Other adverse effects were similar in both groups.
Both buprenorphine and morphine by intravenous PCA provided adequate pain relief after posterior lumbar spinal fusion. The incidences of side effects were similar in both groups except for pruritus which did not appear in buprenorphine group. Buprenorphine was as efficient as morphine and safe for intravenous PCA after spine surgery.
基于阿片类药物的患者自控镇痛(PCA)在脊柱手术后已被广泛且有效地应用。静脉注射阿片类药物的不良反应可能因所用药物和剂量而异。丁丙诺啡,一种阿片类部分激动剂,可能没有传统阿片类药物的不良反应。我们进行了这项前瞻性随机临床试验,以评估丁丙诺啡用于脊柱手术后静脉PCA的有效性和安全性。
50例行择期腰椎融合术的患者被随机分为丁丙诺啡组或吗啡组。PCA以双盲方式给药,术后持续2天。患者转入麻醉后护理单元后开始评估。在术后6、24、48小时,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对静息时和坐位诱发疼痛后的疼痛进行评估并记录。同时收集不良反应。
每组25例患者。丁丙诺啡组有1例患者因头晕退出研究。两组的基线变量无差异。静息时和坐位诱发疼痛后的VAS评分在两组间无差异。术后6小时,丁丙诺啡组的给药量、需求次数和给药次数以及需求/给药比均高于吗啡组,但之后无差异。两组均未发生重大并发症。丁丙诺啡组的瘙痒发生率显著低于吗啡组(0%对24%,P = 0.02)。两组的其他不良反应相似。
静脉PCA使用丁丙诺啡和吗啡均可在腰椎后路融合术后提供充分的疼痛缓解。除丁丙诺啡组未出现瘙痒外,两组的副作用发生率相似。丁丙诺啡在脊柱手术后静脉PCA中与吗啡一样有效且安全。