• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于疗效与毒性权衡的适应性剂量选择:示例与实际考量

Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.

作者信息

Thall Peter F, Cook John D, Estey Elihu H

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Applied Mathematics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2006;16(5):623-38. doi: 10.1080/10543400600860394.

DOI:10.1080/10543400600860394
PMID:17037262
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe and illustrate an outcome-adaptive Bayesian procedure, proposed by Thall and Cook (2004), for assigning doses of an experimental treatment to successive cohorts of patients. The method uses elicited (efficacy, toxicity) probability pairs to construct a family of trade-off contours that are used to quantify the desirability of each dose. This provides a basis for determining a best dose for each cohort. The method combines the goals of conventional Phase I and Phase II trials, and thus may be called a "Phase I-II" design. We first give a general review of the probability model and dose-finding algorithm. We next describe an application to a trial of a biologic agent for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia, including a computer simulation study to assess the design's average behavior. To illustrate how the method may work in practice, we present a cohort-by-cohort example of a particular trial. We close with a discussion of some practical issues that may arise during implementation.

摘要

本文旨在描述并阐释由索尔和库克(2004年)提出的一种结果适应性贝叶斯程序,该程序用于为连续的患者队列分配实验性治疗的剂量。该方法使用引出的(疗效、毒性)概率对来构建一族权衡轮廓,这些轮廓用于量化每个剂量的合意性。这为确定每个队列的最佳剂量提供了基础。该方法结合了传统I期和II期试验的目标,因此可称为“ I-II期”设计。我们首先对概率模型和剂量寻找算法进行一般性综述。接下来,我们描述该方法在一种用于治疗急性髓性白血病的生物制剂试验中的应用,包括一项计算机模拟研究,以评估该设计的平均表现。为了说明该方法在实际中如何运作,我们给出一个特定试验的逐队列示例。最后,我们讨论了实施过程中可能出现的一些实际问题。

相似文献

1
Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.基于疗效与毒性权衡的适应性剂量选择:示例与实际考量
J Biopharm Stat. 2006;16(5):623-38. doi: 10.1080/10543400600860394.
2
Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.在I/II期临床试验中使用毒性和疗效优势比的贝叶斯剂量探索。
Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):777-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x.
3
An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.一种结合毒性和疗效的适应性剂量探索设计。
Stat Med. 2006 Jul 30;25(14):2365-83. doi: 10.1002/sim.2325.
4
Phase I (or phase II) dose-ranging clinical trials: proposal of a two-stage Bayesian design.I期(或II期)剂量范围临床试验:一种两阶段贝叶斯设计的提议
J Biopharm Stat. 2003 Feb;13(1):87-101. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120017728.
5
A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.一种基于I/II期临床试验中的疗效和不良结局进行剂量探索与安全性监测的策略。
Biometrics. 1998 Mar;54(1):251-64.
6
Statistical designs for early phases of cancer clinical trials.癌症临床试验早期阶段的统计设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2012;22(6):1109-26. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.571801.
7
A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.一种联合疗法的平行I/II期临床试验设计。
Biometrics. 2007 Jun;63(2):429-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00685.x.
8
A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.多剂量、随机、安慰剂对照的 I/II 期临床试验的贝叶斯自适应设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):739-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
9
Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.基于毒性概率区间的I期临床试验剂量探索
Clin Trials. 2007;4(3):235-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774507079442.
10
Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs.基于疗效与毒性权衡的剂量探索。
Biometrics. 2004 Sep;60(3):684-93. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00218.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without selective dismutase mimetic in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an adaptive, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2 trial.立体定向体部放疗联合或不联合选择性歧化酶模拟物治疗胰腺腺癌:一项适应性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 1b/2 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2023 Dec;24(12):1387-1398. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00478-3.
2
DROID: dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development.DROID:肿瘤药物研发中优化剂量的剂量范围方法。
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):2907-2919. doi: 10.1111/biom.13840. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
3
Estimating design operating characteristics in Bayesian adaptive clinical trials.
贝叶斯自适应临床试验中的设计操作特征估计
Can J Stat. 2022 Jun;50(2):417-436. doi: 10.1002/cjs.11699. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
4
2D (2 Dimensional) TEQR design for Determining the optimal Dose for safety and efficacy.用于确定安全有效最佳剂量的二维(2D)TEQR设计。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Oct 12;16:100461. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100461. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clinical trials.设计并开展慢性疼痛镇痛概念验证临床试验。
Pain Rep. 2019 Feb 26;4(3):e697. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000697. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
6
An adaptive dose-finding design based on both safety and immunologic responses in cancer clinical trials.一种基于癌症临床试验中安全性和免疫反应的适应性剂量探索设计。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2018;10(3):185-195. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2018.1462727. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
7
Overall success rate of a safe and efficacious drug: Results using six phase 1 designs, each followed by standard phase 2 and 3 designs.一种安全有效药物的总体成功率:采用六种1期设计的结果,每种设计之后均采用标准的2期和3期设计。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 24;12:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.010. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Systematic comparison of the statistical operating characteristics of various Phase I oncology designs.多种I期肿瘤学设计的统计操作特征的系统比较。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Nov 24;5:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.11.006. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
A bargaining approach for resolving the tradeoff between beneficial and harmful drug responses.一种解决有益和有害药物反应之间权衡的讨价还价方法。
J Math Biol. 2018 Oct;77(4):1059-1072. doi: 10.1007/s00285-018-1242-x. Epub 2018 May 7.
10
Extensions of the mTPI and TEQR designs to include non-monotone efficacy in addition to toxicity for optimal dose determination for early phase immunotherapy oncology trials.将mTPI和TEQR设计扩展,除毒性外还纳入非单调疗效,以用于肿瘤免疫治疗早期试验的最佳剂量确定。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Jan 31;10:62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.01.006. eCollection 2018 Jun.