• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DROID:肿瘤药物研发中优化剂量的剂量范围方法。

DROID: dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):2907-2919. doi: 10.1111/biom.13840. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13840
PMID:36807110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11713780/
Abstract

In the era of targeted therapy, there has been increasing concern about the development of oncology drugs based on the "more is better" paradigm, developed decades ago for chemotherapy. Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initiated Project Optimus to reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development. To accommodate this paradigm shifting, we propose a dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose (DROID) for oncology trials with targeted drugs. DROID leverages the well-established dose-ranging study framework, which has been routinely used to develop non-oncology drugs for decades, and bridges it with established oncology dose-finding designs to optimize the dose of oncology drugs. DROID consists of two seamlessly connected stages. In the first stage, patients are sequentially enrolled and adaptively assigned to investigational doses to establish the therapeutic dose range (TDR), defined as the range of doses with acceptable toxicity and efficacy profiles, and the recommended phase 2 dose set (RP2S). In the second stage, patients are randomized to the doses in RP2S to assess the dose-response relationship and identify the optimal dose. The simulation study shows that DROID substantially outperforms the conventional approach, providing a new paradigm to efficiently optimize the dose of targeted oncology drugs. DROID aligns with the approach of a randomized, parallel dose-response trial design recommended by the FDA in the Guidance on Optimizing the Dosage of Human Prescription Drugs and Biological Products for the Treatment of Oncologic Diseases.

摘要

在靶向治疗时代,人们越来越关注基于几十年前为化疗开发的“越多越好”范式的肿瘤药物的发展。最近,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)启动了 Optimus 项目,以改革肿瘤药物开发中的剂量优化和选择范式。为了适应这一范式转变,我们提出了一种用于肿瘤药物临床试验的剂量优化方法(DROID)。DROID 利用了经过充分验证的剂量范围研究框架,该框架几十年来一直被用于开发非肿瘤药物,并将其与已建立的肿瘤剂量发现设计相结合,以优化肿瘤药物的剂量。DROID 由两个无缝连接的阶段组成。在第一阶段,患者按顺序入组,并适应性地分配到研究剂量,以确定治疗剂量范围(TDR),即具有可接受的毒性和疗效特征的剂量范围,以及推荐的 2 期剂量集(RP2S)。在第二阶段,患者随机分配到 RP2S 中的剂量,以评估剂量反应关系并确定最佳剂量。模拟研究表明,DROID 显著优于传统方法,为高效优化靶向肿瘤药物的剂量提供了一种新的范式。DROID 与 FDA 在《优化治疗肿瘤疾病的人用处方药和生物制品剂量的指南》中推荐的随机平行剂量反应试验设计方法一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4abe/11713780/95e536908fcc/nihms-2043054-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4abe/11713780/1c6a4aa11c32/nihms-2043054-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4abe/11713780/95e536908fcc/nihms-2043054-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4abe/11713780/1c6a4aa11c32/nihms-2043054-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4abe/11713780/95e536908fcc/nihms-2043054-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
DROID: dose-ranging approach to optimizing dose in oncology drug development.DROID:肿瘤药物研发中优化剂量的剂量范围方法。
Biometrics. 2023 Dec;79(4):2907-2919. doi: 10.1111/biom.13840. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
2
A Model-Based Trial Design With a Randomization Scheme Considering Pharmacokinetics Exposure for Dose Optimization in Oncology.一种基于模型的试验设计,其随机化方案考虑药代动力学暴露以优化肿瘤学中的剂量
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2454. doi: 10.1002/pst.2454. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
3
Current issues in dose-finding designs: A response to the US Food and Drug Adminstration's Oncology Center of Excellence Project Optimus.剂量探索设计中的当前问题:对美国食品和药物管理局肿瘤卓越中心项目 Optimus 的回应。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):267-272. doi: 10.1177/17407745241234652. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
A comparative study of adaptive trial designs for dose optimization.剂量优化适应性试验设计的比较研究。
Pharm Stat. 2023 Sep-Oct;22(5):797-814. doi: 10.1002/pst.2306. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
A Bayesian Dynamic Model-Based Adaptive Design for Oncology Dose Optimization in Phase I/II Clinical Trials.用于I/II期临床试验肿瘤学剂量优化的基于贝叶斯动态模型的自适应设计
Pharm Stat. 2025 Mar-Apr;24(2):e2451. doi: 10.1002/pst.2451. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
6
Dosage Optimization: A Regulatory Perspective for Developing Oncology Drugs.剂量优化:开发肿瘤药物的监管视角。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Sep;116(3):577-591. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3373. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
7
A 2-in-1 adaptive design to seamlessly expand a selected dose from a phase 2 trial to a phase 3 trial for oncology drug development.一种 2-in-1 自适应设计,用于无缝扩展肿瘤药物开发中从 2 期试验到 3 期试验的选定剂量。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Nov;122:106931. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106931. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
The patient perspective on dose optimization for anticancer treatments: A new era of cancer drug dosing-Challenging the "more is better" dogma.患者视角下的癌症治疗药物剂量优化:癌症药物剂量调整的新纪元——挑战“越多越好”的教条。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):358-362. doi: 10.1177/17407745241232428. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
9
A Bayesian latent-subgroup platform design for dose optimization.一种用于剂量优化的贝叶斯潜在亚组平台设计。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae093.
10
A Multi-Arm Two-Stage (MATS) design for proof-of-concept and dose optimization in early-phase oncology trials.一种用于早期肿瘤试验概念验证和剂量优化的多臂两阶段(MATS)设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Sep;132:107278. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107278. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
BARD: A seamless two-stage dose optimization design integrating backfill and adaptive randomization.BARD:一种整合回填和自适应随机化的无缝两阶段剂量优化设计。
Clin Trials. 2025 Jul 8:17407745251350596. doi: 10.1177/17407745251350596.
2
COMIC: A Bayesian Dose Optimization Design for Drug Combination in Multiple Indications With Application to CAR-T Therapies.COMIC:一种用于多种适应症药物联合的贝叶斯剂量优化设计及其在CAR-T疗法中的应用
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70107. doi: 10.1002/sim.70107.
3
UNITED: A Unified Transparent and Efficient Phase I/II Trial Design for Dose Optimization Accounting for Ordinal Graded, Continuous and Mixed Toxicity and Efficacy Endpoints.

本文引用的文献

1
The Drug-Dosing Conundrum in Oncology - When Less Is More.肿瘤学中的给药难题——少即是多。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1445-1447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2109826. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
2
Dose Optimization of Sotorasib: Is the US Food and Drug Administration Sending a Message?索托拉西布的剂量优化:美国食品药品监督管理局是在传达什么信息吗?
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 1;39(31):3423-3426. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01371. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
3
BOIN12: Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Trial Design for Utility-Based Dose Finding in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies.
UNITED:一种统一、透明且高效的I/II期试验设计,用于考虑有序分级、连续及混合毒性和疗效终点的剂量优化。
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70098. doi: 10.1002/sim.70098.
4
Bayesian model averaging for randomized dose optimization trials in multiple indications.用于多适应症随机剂量优化试验的贝叶斯模型平均法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Feb 10:1-13. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2025.2450325.
5
ROMI: a randomized two-stage basket trial design to optimize doses for multiple indications.ROMI:一种随机两阶段篮子试验设计,旨在优化多种适应症的剂量。
Biometrics. 2024 Oct 3;80(4). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae105.
6
Three steps toward dose optimization for oncology dose finding.肿瘤剂量探索中实现剂量优化的三个步骤。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jun 24;40:101329. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101329. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Dose Optimization of Targeted Therapies for Oncologic Indications.肿瘤适应症靶向治疗的剂量优化
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 9;16(12):2180. doi: 10.3390/cancers16122180.
8
A generalized phase 1-2-3 design integrating dose optimization with confirmatory treatment comparison.一种将剂量优化与确证性治疗比较相结合的广义的 1-2-3 期设计。
Biometrics. 2024 Jan 29;80(1). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujad022.
9
Statistical and practical considerations in planning and conduct of dose-optimization trials.规划和实施剂量优化试验的统计学和实际考虑因素。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):273-286. doi: 10.1177/17407745231207085. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Adaptive phase I-II clinical trial designs identifying optimal biological doses for targeted agents and immunotherapies.适用于靶向药物和免疫疗法的最佳生物剂量的适应性 I- II 期临床试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):298-307. doi: 10.1177/17407745231220661. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
BOIN12:免疫疗法和靶向疗法中基于效用的剂量探索的贝叶斯最优区间I/II期试验设计
JCO Precis Oncol. 2020 Nov 16;4. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00257. eCollection 2020.
4
Model-Assisted Designs for Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Simplicity Meets Superiority.早期临床试验的模型辅助设计:简单与卓越并存
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Oct 24;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00032. eCollection 2019.
5
Bayesian Phase I/II Biomarker-based Dose Finding for Precision Medicine with Molecularly Targeted Agents.基于贝叶斯的 I/II 期生物标志物指导的剂量探索,用于分子靶向药物的精准医学。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;112(518):508-520. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1228534. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
6
A Bayesian Phase I/II Trial Design for Immunotherapy.一种用于免疫疗法的贝叶斯 I/II 期试验设计。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(523):1016-1027. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1383260. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.一种基于效用的贝叶斯最优区间(U-BOIN)I/II期设计,用于确定靶向治疗和免疫治疗的最佳生物学剂量。
Stat Med. 2019 Dec 10;38(28):5299-5316. doi: 10.1002/sim.8361. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
BOIN-ET: Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.BOIN-ET:基于疗效和毒性结果的剂量探索的贝叶斯最优区间设计。
Pharm Stat. 2018 Jul;17(4):383-395. doi: 10.1002/pst.1864. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.新型 I 期临床试验设计的准确性、安全性和可靠性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4357-4364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Phase I-II clinical trial design: a state-of-the-art paradigm for dose finding.I 期-II 期临床试验设计:一种用于剂量探索的最新范例。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;29(3):694-699. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx795.