Booker Calvin W, Schunicht Oliver C, Guichon P Timothy, Jim G Kee, Wildman Brian K, Pittman Tom J, Perrett Tye
Feedlot Health Management Services, PO Box 140, Bay 7, 87 Elizabeth Street, Okotoks, Alberta, Canada, T1S 2A2.
Vet Ther. 2006 Fall;7(3):257-74.
The relative effect of metaphylactic ceftiofur crystalline free acid (CCFA) versus metaphylactic tilmicosin was evaluated in beef calves under commercial feedlot conditions in Nebraska. At feedlot arrival, 11,605 animals at ultrahigh risk of developing bovine respiratory disease (BRD) were allocated to one of three experimental groups: CCFA-3 (6.6 mg/kg SC), CCFA-7 (6.6 mg/kg), or TILM-3 (tilmicosin, 10 mg/kg SC). Animals were eligible for subsequent BRD treatment 3 (CCFA-3 and TILM-3 groups) or 7 (CCFA-7 group) days later. Compared with the TILM-3 group, overall chronicity, overall mortality, BRD mortality, and metabolic mortality rates were significantly (P < .05) lower in the CCFA-3 and CCFA-7 groups; average daily gain was significantly (P < .05) higher in the CCFA-3 group; the proportion of quality grade No Roll carcasses was significantly (P < .05) lower in the CCFA-3 and CCFA-7 groups; and there were per-animal advantages of 22.05 dollars and 18.98 dollars in the CCFA-3 and CCFA-7 groups, respectively. In beef calves at ultrahigh risk of developing BRD, it is more cost effective to administer metaphylactic CCFA than tilmicosin at feedlot arrival.
在内布拉斯加州的商业饲养场条件下,对头孢噻呋晶体游离酸(CCFA)与替米考星进行预防性给药的相对效果进行了评估。在饲养场入栏时,将11605头患牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)风险极高的动物分配到三个实验组之一:CCFA - 3(皮下注射6.6毫克/千克)、CCFA - 7(6.6毫克/千克)或TILM - 3(替米考星,皮下注射10毫克/千克)。3天(CCFA - 3和TILM - 3组)或7天(CCFA - 7组)后,动物有资格接受后续的BRD治疗。与TILM - 3组相比,CCFA - 3组和CCFA - 7组的总体慢性病发生率、总体死亡率、BRD死亡率和代谢死亡率显著更低(P < 0.05);CCFA - 3组的平均日增重显著更高(P < 0.05);CCFA - 3组和CCFA - 7组中优质无卷胴体的比例显著更低(P < 0.05);CCFA - 3组和CCFA - 7组每头动物分别有22.05美元和18.98美元的优势。在患BRD风险极高的肉牛犊中,饲养场入栏时预防性使用CCFA比替米考星更具成本效益。