Suppr超能文献

所有使用鼻腔填塞的鼻出血患者都需要住院吗?一项对116例按照同行评审方案在急诊处理的患者的回顾性研究。

Do all epistaxis patients with a nasal pack need admission? A retrospective study of 116 patients managed in accident and emergency according to a peer reviewed protocol.

作者信息

Van Wyk F C, Massey S, Worley G, Brady S

机构信息

ENT Department, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, UK.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2007 Mar;121(3):222-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106003148. Epub 2006 Oct 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Epistaxis is the most common nasal emergency and if nasal packing is required this commonly results in admission.

METHODS

A literature search could find no published (UK) protocols for the management of this common condition in accident and emergency (A&E) departments. This paper presents a retrospective review of 116 patients with epistaxis, following implementation of the new peer reviewed protocol in June 2004.

RESULTS

Apart from cautery, 62 had nasal packing inserted. Only 17 required admission. Forty-six patients were discharged with nasal packing in situ and only seven (16 per cent) returned due to bleeding. The overall return rate was 11 per cent.

DISCUSSION

We feel this is a safe and logical protocol. Compared to mandatory admission after nasal pack insertion, we saved 39 admissions in five months. There were also the added benefits to patients of being able to recuperate at home rather than in hospital and avoidance of the risk of hospital acquired infection.

摘要

引言

鼻出血是最常见的鼻部急症,若需要进行鼻腔填塞,通常会导致患者住院。

方法

文献检索未发现英国关于急症科处理这一常见病症的已发表方案。本文对2004年6月实施新的经同行评审的方案后116例鼻出血患者进行了回顾性研究。

结果

除烧灼治疗外,62例患者进行了鼻腔填塞。仅17例需要住院。46例患者鼻腔填塞后出院,仅7例(16%)因出血返回。总体返回率为11%。

讨论

我们认为这是一个安全且合理的方案。与鼻腔填塞后强制住院相比,我们在五个月内减少了39例住院。此外,患者还能在家中而非医院康复,避免了医院获得性感染的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验