Schilling Lisa M, Kozak Katarzyna, Lundahl Kristy, Dellavalle Robert P
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Dec 15;164(12):1141-4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj349. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
Although critical analysis of survey research is limited when reviewers and readers cannot view a study's questionnaire, access to novel questionnaires used in published research has not been systematically examined. The authors identified publications reporting the results of novel questionnaires in three medical journals (JAMA, The New England Journal of Medicine, and The Lancet) in January 2000-May 2003 and searched portable document format (PDF) versions of the studies for the complete questionnaire or a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) providing access to the questionnaire. When the questionnaire was not provided in the publication or a published URL, the authors requested it from the corresponding author in writing up to three times over a 6-week period. Of 93 publications with novel questionnaires, four printed the questionnaire in the article and three provided online access. Corresponding authors failed to provide questionnaires for 37 of 81 (46%) studies. Novel questionnaires used in published research are frequently not available to readers or researchers. Policies that improve access to novel questionnaires will allow better assessment of study results, reduce duplicated efforts, and improve authorship attribution for questionnaire design.
尽管当评审人员和读者无法查看研究的调查问卷时,对调查研究的批判性分析会受到限制,但尚未对已发表研究中使用的新型调查问卷的获取情况进行系统研究。作者在2000年1月至2003年5月期间,在三种医学期刊(《美国医学会杂志》《新英格兰医学杂志》和《柳叶刀》)中识别出报告新型调查问卷结果的出版物,并在这些研究的便携式文档格式(PDF)版本中搜索完整的调查问卷或提供调查问卷访问权限的统一资源定位符(URL)。当出版物中未提供调查问卷或已发布的URL时,作者在6周内最多三次以书面形式向通讯作者索要。在93篇使用新型调查问卷的出版物中,有4篇在文章中印刷了调查问卷,3篇提供了在线访问。在81项研究中,有37项(46%)的通讯作者未能提供调查问卷。已发表研究中使用的新型调查问卷通常读者或研究人员无法获取。改善新型调查问卷获取情况的政策将有助于更好地评估研究结果,减少重复工作,并改善调查问卷设计的作者归属。