Grant Michael A, Wernberg Jane S, Van Khanh T, Albert Angelina M
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Pacific Regional Laboratory, Northwest, Bothell, WA 98021, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2006 Sep-Oct;89(5):1317-26.
The current AOAC Method 966.24 for enumeration of Escherichia coli in foods uses a most probable number (MPN) procedure with extensive confirmation steps. Two new methods based on membrane filtration (MF) were compared to the MPN reference method for detection of high levels of E. coli in 5 food types, some of which represent categories for which the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandates additional testing if an action level of 10(4)/g E. coli is exceeded. Ground beef, which is not FDA regulated, was also tested. The 5 food types were all inoculated at 3 levels: 10(2)/g, > or = 10(4)/g, and > or = 10(5)/g E. coli. An MF protocol using either m-ColiBlue24 (CB) or lauryl sulfate tryptose plus BCIG (LST/BCIG) was an effective potential alternative to the reference method. Sensitivity and specificity for both CB and LST/BCIG were 98 and 100%, respectively. Agreement between MPN and both CB and LST/BCIG was 98%. The 2 proposed methods allow completion of both presumptive and confirmatory steps in 1-3 days, whereas the reference method requires as many as 11 days. Exclusivity testing with 50 non-E. coli strains indicated 100% were correctly ruled out by the proposed protocols. Inclusivity testing was used to determine whether typical results were obtained after incubation of E. coli cultures on CB or LST/BCIG for 24 h. Of 50 E. coli strains tested, 100% yielded typical results after incubation on CB, and 98% yielded typical results after incubation on LST/BCIG.
现行的AOAC方法966.24用于食品中大肠杆菌的计数,采用了最大可能数(MPN)程序以及广泛的确认步骤。将两种基于膜过滤(MF)的新方法与MPN参考方法进行比较,以检测5种食品类型中高含量的大肠杆菌,其中一些食品类型属于美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)规定的若大肠杆菌含量超过10⁴/g行动水平就需进行额外检测的类别。未受FDA监管的碎牛肉也进行了检测。这5种食品类型均接种了3个水平的大肠杆菌:10²/g、≥10⁴/g和≥10⁵/g。使用m - 大肠杆菌蓝24(CB)或月桂基硫酸盐胰蛋白胨加BCIG(LST/BCIG)的MF方案是参考方法的一种有效的潜在替代方法。CB和LST/BCIG的灵敏度和特异性分别为98%和100%。MPN与CB和LST/BCIG之间的一致性为98%。这两种提议的方法可在1 - 3天内完成推测性和确认性步骤,而参考方法则需要多达11天。对50株非大肠杆菌菌株进行的排他性测试表明,提议的方案能100%正确排除这些菌株。采用包容性测试来确定大肠杆菌培养物在CB或LST/BCIG上培养24小时后是否能得到典型结果。在测试的50株大肠杆菌菌株中,在CB上培养后100%产生典型结果,在LST/BCIG上培养后98%产生典型结果。