Suppr超能文献

在多项体外和体内转运试验中,丙戊酸不是P-糖蛋白或多药耐药蛋白1和2的底物。

Valproic acid is not a substrate for P-glycoprotein or multidrug resistance proteins 1 and 2 in a number of in vitro and in vivo transport assays.

作者信息

Baltes Steffen, Fedrowitz Maren, Tortós Carlos Luna, Potschka Heidrun, Löscher Wolfgang

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jan;320(1):331-43. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.102491. Epub 2006 Oct 16.

Abstract

The antiepileptic drug valproic acid (VPA) is widely used in the treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorders, and migraine. However, rather high doses are required for the clinical effects of VPA, which is due to its relatively inefficient delivery to the brain. The poor brain distribution of VPA is thought to reflect an asymmetric transport system at the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Based on recent data from in vitro experiments, multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs) have been proposed to be involved in the efflux transport of VPA at the BBB. In the present study, we used different experimental in vitro and in vivo strategies to evaluate whether VPA is a substrate for MRPs or the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein (Pgp). In contrast to known Pgp or MRP substrates, such as cyclosporin A or vinblastine, no directional transport of VPA was observed in cell monolayer efflux assays using the kidney cell lines Madin Darby canine kidney II and LLC-PK1, which had been transfected with either human or mouse cDNAs for the genes encoding Pgp, MRP1, or MRP2. Likewise, no indication for efflux transport of VPA was obtained in a rat microdialysis model, using inhibitors of either Pgp or MRPs. Furthermore, a significant role of MRP2 in brain efflux of VPA was excluded by using MRP2-deficient rats. Our data do not support the hypothesis that MRP1 or MRP2 is involved in the efflux of VPA from the brain. Thus, the molecular identity of the putative transporter(s) mediating the active efflux of VPA from the brain remains to be elucidated.

摘要

抗癫痫药物丙戊酸(VPA)广泛用于治疗癫痫、双相情感障碍和偏头痛。然而,VPA产生临床效果需要相当高的剂量,这是因为其向大脑的递送效率相对较低。VPA在大脑中的分布较差被认为反映了血脑屏障(BBB)处的不对称转运系统。基于最近的体外实验数据,多药耐药蛋白(MRPs)被认为参与了VPA在BBB处的外排转运。在本研究中,我们使用了不同的体外和体内实验策略来评估VPA是否是MRPs或外排转运蛋白P-糖蛋白(Pgp)的底物。与已知的Pgp或MRP底物(如环孢素A或长春碱)不同,在使用已转染人或小鼠编码Pgp、MRP1或MRP2基因cDNA的肾细胞系Madin Darby犬肾II和LLC-PK1进行的细胞单层外排试验中,未观察到VPA的定向转运。同样,在大鼠微透析模型中,使用Pgp或MRPs抑制剂也未获得VPA外排转运的迹象。此外,通过使用MRP2缺陷大鼠排除了MRP2在VPA脑外排中的重要作用。我们的数据不支持MRP1或MRP2参与VPA从大脑外排的假设。因此,介导VPA从大脑主动外排的假定转运蛋白的分子身份仍有待阐明。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验