Thompson Judith A, O'Sullivan Peter B, Briffa N Kathryn, Neumann Patricia
School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, 6845, Western Australia, Australia.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul;18(7):779-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0225-4. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
Transperineal (TP) and transabdominal (TA) ultrasounds were used to assess bladder neck (TP) and bladder base (TA) movement during voluntary pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction and functional tasks. A sonographer assessed 60 asymptomatic (30 nulliparous, 30 parous) and 60 incontinent (30 stress, 30 urge) women with a mean age of 43 (SD=7) years, BMI of 24 (SD=4) kg m2 and a median parity of 2 (range, 0-5), using both ultrasound methods. The mean of three measurements for bladder neck and bladder base (sagittal view) movement for each task was assessed for differences between the groups. There were no differences in bladder neck (p=0.096) or bladder base (p=0.112) movement between the four groups during voluntary PFM contraction but significant differences in bladder neck (p<0.004) and a trend towards differences in bladder base (p=0.068) movement during Valsalva and abdominal curl manoeuvre. During PFM contraction, there was a strong trend for the continent women to have greater bladder neck elevation (p=0.051), but no difference in bladder base movement (p=0.300), when compared to the incontinent women. The incontinent women demonstrated increased bladder neck descent during Valsalva and abdominal curl (p<0.001) and bladder base descent during Valsalva (p=0.021). The differences between the groups were more marked during functional activities, suggesting that comprehensive assessment of the PFM should include functional activities as well as voluntary PFM contractions. TP ultrasound was more reliable and takes measures from a bony landmark when compared to TA ultrasound, which lacks a reference point for measurements. TA ultrasound is less suitable for PFM measures during functional manoeuvres and comparisons between subjects. Few subjects were overweight so the results may not be valid in an obese population.
经会阴(TP)超声和经腹(TA)超声用于评估在自主盆底肌(PFM)收缩及功能任务期间膀胱颈(TP)和膀胱底部(TA)的移动情况。一名超声检查人员使用两种超声方法对60名无症状女性(30名未生育,30名经产妇)和60名尿失禁女性(30名压力性尿失禁,30名急迫性尿失禁)进行了评估,这些女性的平均年龄为43(标准差 = 7)岁,体重指数为24(标准差 = 4)kg/m²,中位产次为2(范围0 - 5)。评估了每个任务中膀胱颈和膀胱底部(矢状面)移动的三次测量值的平均值,以比较组间差异。在自主PFM收缩期间,四组之间膀胱颈(p = 0.096)或膀胱底部(p = 0.112)的移动没有差异,但在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作和腹部卷曲动作期间,膀胱颈移动存在显著差异(p < 0.004),膀胱底部移动有差异趋势(p = 0.068)。在PFM收缩期间,与尿失禁女性相比,控尿女性膀胱颈抬高有强烈趋势(p = 0.051),但膀胱底部移动无差异(p = 0.300)。尿失禁女性在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作和腹部卷曲动作期间膀胱颈下降增加(p < 0.001),在瓦尔萨尔瓦动作期间膀胱底部下降(p = 0.021)。组间差异在功能活动期间更为明显,这表明对PFM的综合评估应包括功能活动以及自主PFM收缩。与TA超声相比,TP超声更可靠,且从骨性标志进行测量,而TA超声缺乏测量的参考点。TA超声不太适合在功能动作期间进行PFM测量以及受试者之间的比较。很少有受试者超重,因此结果在肥胖人群中可能无效。