Thompson Judith A, O'Sullivan Peter B, Briffa N Kathryn, Neumann Patricia
School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, G.P.O. Box U1987 Perth, 6845, Western Australia,
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):624-30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-006-0081-2. Epub 2006 Mar 11.
The aims of the study were: (1) to assess women performing voluntary pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions, on initial instruction without biofeedback teaching, using transperineal ultrasound, manual muscle testing, and perineometry and (2) to assess for associations between the different measurements of PFM function. Sixty continent (30 nulliparous and 30 parous) and 60 incontinent (30 stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and 30 urge urinary incontinence (UUI)) women were assessed. Bladder neck depression during attempts to perform an elevating pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contraction occurred in 17% of continent and 30% of incontinent women. The UUI group had the highest proportion of women who depressed the bladder neck (40%), although this was not statistically significant (p=0.060). The continent women were stronger on manual muscle testing (p=0.001) and perineometry (p=0.019) and had greater PFM endurance (p<0.001) than the incontinent women. There was a strong tendency for the continent women to have a greater degree of bladder neck elevation than the incontinent women (p=0.051). There was a moderate correlation between bladder neck movement during PFM contraction measured by ultrasound and PFM strength assessed by manual muscle testing (r=0.58, p=0.01) and perineometry (r=0.43, p=0.01). The observation that many women were performing PFM exercises incorrectly reinforces the need for individual PFM assessment with a skilled practitioner. The significant correlation between the measurements of bladder neck elevation during PFM contraction and PFM strength measured using MMT and perineometry supports the use of ultrasound in the assessment of PFM function; however, the correlation was only moderate and, therefore, indicates that the different measurement tools assess different aspects of PFM function. It is recommended that physiotherapists use a combination of assessment tools to evaluate the different aspects of PFM function that are important for continence. Ultrasound is useful to determine the direction of pelvic floor movement in the clinical assessment of pelvic floor muscle function in a mixed subject population.
(1)在未进行生物反馈教学的初始指导下,使用经会阴超声、手法肌力测试和会阴压力测定法,评估进行自愿盆底肌(PFM)收缩的女性;(2)评估PFM功能不同测量方法之间的关联。对60名控尿女性(30名未生育和30名已生育)和60名尿失禁女性(30名压力性尿失禁(SUI)和30名急迫性尿失禁(UUI))进行了评估。在试图进行盆底肌(PFM)提升收缩时,17%的控尿女性和30%的尿失禁女性出现膀胱颈下移。尽管差异无统计学意义(p=0.060),但UUI组中膀胱颈下移的女性比例最高(40%)。与尿失禁女性相比,控尿女性在手法肌力测试(p=0.001)和会阴压力测定法(p=0.019)中更强,且具有更强的PFM耐力(p<0.001)。控尿女性膀胱颈抬高程度高于尿失禁女性的趋势较为明显(p=0.051)。超声测量的PFM收缩时膀胱颈移动与手法肌力测试评估的PFM强度(r=0.58,p=0.01)和会阴压力测定法(r=0.43,p=0.01)之间存在中度相关性。许多女性进行PFM锻炼方法不正确这一观察结果,强化了由熟练从业者进行个体PFM评估的必要性。PFM收缩时膀胱颈抬高测量值与使用MMT和会阴压力测定法测量的PFM强度之间的显著相关性,支持使用超声评估PFM功能;然而,这种相关性仅为中度,因此表明不同的测量工具评估PFM功能的不同方面。建议物理治疗师使用多种评估工具来评估对控尿至关重要的PFM功能的不同方面。在混合受试者群体的盆底肌功能临床评估中,超声有助于确定盆底移动方向。