van Uffelen Jannique G Z, Chin A Paw Marijke J M, Klein Martin, van Mechelen Willem, Hopman-Rock Marijke
Body@Work, Research Center Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;22(3):203-10. doi: 10.1002/gps.1661.
Development of efficient methods for identifying subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) from the general population is warranted, because these subjects represent an important group for (epidemiological) research purposes.
(1) To describe a two-step population screening for identifying adults with MCI from the general population for research purposes, by questionnaire and telephone; (2) to compare screening by telephone (method 1) to a subsequent face-to-face assessment (method 2).
In method 1, subjects with memory complaints were identified from the general population (n = 5491) by a postal questionnaire. Subsequently, cognitive status and memory were assessed in a telephone interview using the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status and the Ten Word Learning Test. Next, subjects with MCI according to method 1 were subjected to a face-to-face assessment for method 2, in which cognitive status and memory were assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT).
Two hundred and twenty-seven subjects completed both the telephone interview and the face-to-face assessment. Ninety-three subjects (41%) had MCI according to both methods. Seven subjects (3%) failed to meet MCI criteria according to method two because of an MMSE score <24; 127 subjects (56%) failed because of normal AVLT scores.
(1) The two-step population screening was able to detect a considerable number of MCI-subjects in the general population; (2) agreement between both methods was moderate. Therefore, the method of recruiting subjects for (epidemiological) studies has to be taken into consideration when interpreting results of these studies.
鉴于轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者是(流行病学)研究的重要对象群体,因此有必要开发从普通人群中识别MCI患者的有效方法。
(1)描述一种通过问卷调查和电话进行的两步式人群筛查方法,用于从普通人群中识别成年MCI患者以进行研究;(2)比较电话筛查(方法1)与后续面对面评估(方法2)。
在方法1中,通过邮政问卷从普通人群(n = 5491)中识别出有记忆问题的受试者。随后,使用认知状态电话访谈和十词学习测试在电话访谈中评估认知状态和记忆。接下来,根据方法1诊断为MCI的受试者接受方法2的面对面评估,其中使用简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和听觉词语学习测试(AVLT)评估认知状态和记忆。
227名受试者完成了电话访谈和面对面评估。根据两种方法,93名受试者(41%)患有MCI。7名受试者(3%)因MMSE评分<24未达到方法二的MCI标准;127名受试者(56%)因AVLT评分正常未达到标准。
(1)两步式人群筛查能够在普通人群中检测出相当数量的MCI患者;(2)两种方法之间的一致性为中等。因此,在解释这些研究结果时,必须考虑(流行病学)研究中招募受试者的方法。