Suppr超能文献

阿尔茨海默病型痴呆的画钟测试:记忆障碍门诊中三种评分方法的比较

The Clock Drawing Test for dementia of the Alzheimer's type: A comparison of three scoring methods in a memory disorders clinic.

作者信息

Brodaty H, Moore C M

机构信息

University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1997 Jun;12(6):619-27.

PMID:9215942
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the reliability and validity of the Clock Drawing Test when used as a cognitive screening instrument for mild to moderate dementia, and to compare different scoring mechanisms.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of clock drawing performance using three published scoring methods (Shulman, Sunderland and Wolf-Klein).

SETTING

Hospital-based memory disorders clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of 28 consecutive patients attending the memory clinic for assessment who were given a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (mild or moderate) and 28 age- and sex-matched control subjects comprising 17 memory clinic attenders found to be normal and 11 community volunteers.

MEASUREMENTS

Sensitivity and specificity of the three clock rating scales against memory clinic diagnoses of dementia using DSM-III-R; their respective interrater reliabilities; and comparisons of each with measures of cognitive impairment (the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Blessed Orientation-Information-Memory-Concentration Test), daily performance of basic and instrumental activities (the Blessed Dementia Scale) and depression (the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression).

RESULTS

All methods of scoring the Clock Drawing Test correlated well with measures of cognitive impairment (r = 0.57-0.73) and daily performance (r = 0.38-0.48), were independent of mild depression and demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity and interrater reliability. While all clock scales identified mild to moderate dementia reasonably well, the Shulman method performed best. In screening for dementia, clock drawing proved superior to the MMSE: 24/28 vs 20/28 cases identified. When compared with the MMSE, clock drawing provided additional diagnostic discrimination, identifying 7/8 AD patients with MMSE scores = 24.

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinic population, clock drawing, especially if scored according to the Shulman scale and combined with the MMSE, is an extremely efficient test screening measure for mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer's type with low false negative and false positive rates. This may have implications for screening elderly populations.

摘要

目的

检验钟表绘制测试作为轻度至中度痴呆认知筛查工具时的信度和效度,并比较不同的评分机制。

设计

采用三种已发表的评分方法(舒尔曼法、桑德兰法和沃尔夫 - 克莱因法)对钟表绘制表现进行回顾性分析。

设置

以医院为基础的记忆障碍诊所。

参与者

连续28例到记忆诊所接受评估且被诊断为阿尔茨海默病(轻度或中度)的患者,以及28例年龄和性别匹配的对照对象,其中包括17例在记忆诊所检查发现正常的患者和11名社区志愿者。

测量

使用DSM - III - R,三种钟表评分量表对记忆诊所痴呆诊断的敏感性和特异性;它们各自的评分者间信度;以及将每种量表与认知损害测量方法(简易精神状态检查表和布列斯德定向 - 信息 - 记忆 - 注意力测试)、基本和工具性活动的日常表现(布列斯德痴呆量表)以及抑郁(汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表)进行比较。

结果

钟表绘制测试的所有评分方法与认知损害测量方法(r = 0.57 - 0.73)和日常表现(r = 0.38 - 0.48)相关性良好,与轻度抑郁无关,并显示出高敏感性、特异性和评分者间信度。虽然所有钟表量表都能较好地识别轻度至中度痴呆,但舒尔曼法表现最佳。在筛查痴呆时,钟表绘制被证明优于简易精神状态检查表:分别识别出24/28例和20/28例。与简易精神状态检查表相比,钟表绘制提供了额外的诊断区分能力,识别出7/8例简易精神状态检查表得分 = 24的阿尔茨海默病患者。

结论

在临床人群中,钟表绘制,特别是按照舒尔曼量表评分并结合简易精神状态检查表,是一种对阿尔茨海默病类型的轻度至中度痴呆极为有效的筛查测试方法,假阴性和假阳性率低。这可能对老年人群的筛查有影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验