• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁在掌控局面?刻意的内容与掌控感。

Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.

作者信息

Sebanz Natalie, Lackner Ulrich

机构信息

Psychology Department, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2007 Dec;16(4):859-76. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2006.08.002
PMID:17045811
Abstract

Based on Pacherie's dynamic theory of intentions, this study investigated how the way an intention is formed and sustained affects action performance and the experience of control during acting. In Experiment 1, task-irrelevant verbal commands were given while participants responded to stimuli in a two-choice reaction time (RT) task. The commands referred to an action goal congruent or incongruent with the actor's current intention, or ordered the initiation or abortion of the action. In Experiment 2, the same commands were given as participants freely chose between two actions. The distractors affected performance in the reactive task only. In both experiments, feelings of control were based on movement parameters as well as perceived (mis)matches between distractors and intended actions. These findings suggest that the way an intention is implemented affects how well it can be shielded against external perturbations and how much one feels in control.

摘要

基于帕谢里的意图动态理论,本研究调查了意图形成和维持的方式如何影响行动表现以及行动过程中的控制体验。在实验1中,当参与者在二选一反应时(RT)任务中对刺激做出反应时,给出了与任务无关的言语指令。这些指令涉及与行动者当前意图一致或不一致的行动目标,或者命令行动的启动或中止。在实验2中,当参与者在两个行动之间自由选择时,给出了相同的指令。干扰因素仅影响反应性任务中的表现。在两个实验中,控制感都基于运动参数以及干扰因素与预期行动之间的感知(不)匹配。这些发现表明,意图的实施方式会影响其抵御外部干扰的能力以及个人的控制感。

相似文献

1
Who's calling the shots? Intentional content and feelings of control.谁在掌控局面?刻意的内容与掌控感。
Conscious Cogn. 2007 Dec;16(4):859-76. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2006.08.002. Epub 2006 Oct 12.
2
Subjective agency and awareness of shared actions.主观能动性和共同行动的意识。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Hierarchical encoding of behavior: translating perception into action.行为的分层编码:将感知转化为行动。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):588-608. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.588.
4
Intentional control and implicit sequence learning.有意控制与内隐序列学习。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):354-69. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.354.
5
How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.任务表征如何引导注意力:任务集屏蔽功能的进一步证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Mar;35(2):477-86. doi: 10.1037/a0014647.
6
The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.注意力自动定向到与目标相关的刺激上。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 May;134(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
7
Conflict-triggered goal shielding: response conflicts attenuate background monitoring for prospective memory cues.冲突引发的目标屏蔽:反应冲突会削弱对前瞻性记忆线索的背景监测。
Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;19(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02042.x.
8
What activates the human mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: bottom-up visual features or top-down intentions?在观察人为动作时,是什么激活了人类镜像神经元系统:自下而上的视觉特征还是自上而下的意图?
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.025. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
9
What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming.直接匹配中匹配的是什么?意图归因调节运动启动。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Jun;34(3):578-91. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.578.
10
Absent minds and absent agents: attention-lapse induced alienation of agency.走神的心智与缺席的主体:注意力 lapse 引发的主体疏离感 。 注:这里“lapse”可能原词有误,推测可能是“loss”之类的词,若准确词不同,译文表述会更准确。
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):481-93. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Linking actions and memories: Probing the interplay of action-effect congruency, agency experience, and recognition memory.将动作与记忆相联系:探究动作-效应一致性、能动体验和识别记忆之间的相互作用。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct 9. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01644-2.
2
Action Choice and Outcome Congruency Independently Affect Intentional Binding and Feeling of Control Judgments.行动选择与结果一致性独立影响意图绑定和控制感判断。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 11;12:137. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00137. eCollection 2018.
3
Effects of free choice and outcome valence on the sense of agency: evidence from measures of intentional binding and feelings of control.
自由选择和结果效价对能动感的影响:来自意向性联结测量和控制感的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jan;236(1):129-139. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5112-3. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
4
Freedom, choice, and the sense of agency.自由、选择和自主性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 29;7:514. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00514. eCollection 2013.
5
Action selection and action awareness.动作选择与动作意识。
Psychol Res. 2009 Jul;73(4):602-12. doi: 10.1007/s00426-009-0240-4. Epub 2009 Apr 8.