Hayes John J, Sharma Arjun D, Love John C, Herre John M, Leonen Anna O, Kudenchuk Peter J
Marshfield Clinic and Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 17;48(8):1628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.071. Epub 2006 Sep 26.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether QRS duration or morphology increased the risk of adverse outcome in the DAVID (Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator) trial.
The DAVID trial found an increased risk of the combined end point of death and new or worsening congestive heart failure (CHF) in defibrillator recipients who were paced DDDR-70 versus VVI-40.
We analyzed the combined end point in patients with abnormal QRS duration (AbQRS) (> or =110 ms) compared with those with normal QRS duration (NQRS) (<110 ms).
The QRS data were available for 496 of the 506 patients enrolled in the trial, including 223 patients with NQRS (45%) and 273 patients with AbQRS (55%). In patients in whom defibrillators were programmed to pace infrequently (VVI-40), having an NQRS or AbQRS was not an indicator of increased risk of adverse outcome. However, among patients in whom defibrillators were programmed in a manner that promoted more frequent ventricular pacing (DDDR-70), there was a significant adverse interaction with AbQRS; this combination was independently associated with a higher risk for developing CHF or death (p = 0.017).
Although patients with AbQRS tended to have other risk factors associated with poor outcome, the interaction of QRS duration with ventricular pacing (DDDR-70) independently contributed to a worse outcome and therefore, was a marker of patients in whom such treatment may be harmful. This should not imply that right ventricular pacing in NQRS patients is safe but rather that pacing in the context of an AbQRS is probably best avoided.
本研究旨在确定在双腔与VVI植入式心脏除颤器(DAVID)试验中,QRS波时限或形态是否会增加不良结局的风险。
DAVID试验发现,与VVI-40起搏的除颤器接受者相比,DDDR-70起搏的除颤器接受者发生死亡及新发或恶化的充血性心力衰竭(CHF)这一联合终点的风险增加。
我们分析了QRS波时限异常(AbQRS,≥110毫秒)的患者与QRS波时限正常(NQRS,<110毫秒)的患者的联合终点情况。
该试验纳入的506例患者中有496例患者的QRS波数据可用,其中包括223例NQRS患者(45%)和273例AbQRS患者(55%)。在除颤器被程控为较少起搏(VVI-40)的患者中,NQRS或AbQRS并非不良结局风险增加的指标。然而,在除颤器被程控为促进更频繁心室起搏(DDDR-70)的患者中,AbQRS存在显著的不良相互作用;这种组合独立地与发生CHF或死亡的较高风险相关(p = 0.017)。
尽管AbQRS患者往往有其他与不良结局相关的危险因素,但QRS波时限与心室起搏(DDDR-70)的相互作用独立地导致了更差的结局,因此,是此类治疗可能有害的患者的一个标志。这并不意味着NQRS患者的右心室起搏是安全的,而是意味着在AbQRS情况下可能最好避免起搏。