Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 68 Városmajor Street, 1122, Budapest, Hungary.
Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20594. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47092-x.
Choosing the optimal device during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade can be challenging. Therefore, we sought to provide a solution for identifying patients in whom upgrading to a CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) is associated with better long-term survival than upgrading to a CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P). To this end, we first applied topological data analysis to create a patient similarity network using 16 clinical features of 326 patients without prior ventricular arrhythmias who underwent CRT upgrade. Then, in the generated circular network, we delineated three phenogroups exhibiting significant differences in clinical characteristics and risk of all-cause mortality. Importantly, only in the high-risk phenogroup was upgrading to a CRT-D associated with better survival than upgrading to a CRT-P (hazard ratio: 0.454 (0.228-0.907), p = 0.025). Finally, we assigned each patient to one of the three phenogroups based on their location in the network and used this labeled data to train multi-class classifiers to enable the risk stratification of new patients. During internal validation, an ensemble of 5 multi-layer perceptrons exhibited the best performance with a balanced accuracy of 0.898 (0.854-0.942) and a micro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.983 (0.980-0.986). To allow further validation, we made the proposed model publicly available ( https://github.com/tokmarton/crt-upgrade-risk-stratification ).
在心脏再同步治疗 (CRT) 升级过程中选择最佳设备可能具有挑战性。因此,我们试图提供一种解决方案,以确定升级为 CRT 除颤器 (CRT-D) 比升级为 CRT 起搏器 (CRT-P) 与长期生存改善相关的患者。为此,我们首先应用拓扑数据分析方法,使用 326 名无先前室性心律失常患者的 16 项临床特征,创建患者相似性网络。然后,在生成的循环网络中,我们划定了三个表型组,这些表型组在临床特征和全因死亡率风险方面存在显著差异。重要的是,只有在高危表型组中,升级为 CRT-D 比升级为 CRT-P 与更好的生存相关(风险比:0.454(0.228-0.907),p=0.025)。最后,我们根据患者在网络中的位置将每个患者分配到三个表型组之一,并使用此标记数据来训练多类分类器,以对新患者进行风险分层。在内部验证期间,5 个多层感知机的集成表现出最佳性能,平衡准确率为 0.898(0.854-0.942),微平均接收器操作特征曲线下面积为 0.983(0.980-0.986)。为了允许进一步验证,我们将提出的模型公开提供(https://github.com/tokmarton/crt-upgrade-risk-stratification)。