Haywood G A, Ward J, Ward D E, Camm A J
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. Georges Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2054-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06941.x.
The value of measurement of the atrioventricular (AV) Wenckebach point at rest as a predictor of progression to AV block was investigated prospectively. Twenty-four patients with sinoatrial disease without evidence of conduction disturbance on 12-lead ECG or 24-hour ambulatory monitoring were paced with Medtronic Activitrax II, Medtronic Legend, or Telectronics Meta MV systems in AAI or AAIR modes. Patients were monitored for symptoms and evidence of AV block on 24-hour tapes. The mean age of the patients was 67 years (range: 42-88). There were 11 males and 13 females. The mean follow-up time was 10.7 +/- 5 months. Four patients required revision of pacing system as a result of development of AV block during follow-up. One other patient manifested intermittent second-degree AV block and remains in AAI. The AV Wenckebach points measured at 1 month postimplantation in the four patients who developed AV block requiring revision of system were 140, 125, 165, and 60 (mean 123 +/- 4). The mean AV Wenckebach point at first assessment in the remaining 20 patients was 153 +/- 24. The mean age of those requiring revision of system was 71 +/- 7 compared with 67 +/- 14 in those who did not. In this small series the frequency of development of significant AV block was 17%. This is markedly higher than in other recently reported series. The study demonstrates that an AV Wenckebach point above 120/min does not confer immunity from progression to AV block.
前瞻性研究静息时房室(AV)文氏点测量值作为预测进展为房室传导阻滞的价值。24例窦房结疾病患者,其12导联心电图或24小时动态心电图监测无传导障碍证据,采用美敦力Activitrax II、美敦力Legend或泰利特Meta MV系统以AAI或AAIR模式进行起搏。通过24小时磁带监测患者的症状和房室传导阻滞证据。患者平均年龄67岁(范围:42 - 88岁)。男性11例,女性13例。平均随访时间为10.7±5个月。4例患者因随访期间发生房室传导阻滞而需要更换起搏系统。另1例患者表现为间歇性二度房室传导阻滞,仍采用AAI模式。4例发生房室传导阻滞需要更换系统的患者在植入后1个月测得的AV文氏点分别为140、125、165和60(平均123±4)。其余20例患者首次评估时的平均AV文氏点为153±24。需要更换系统的患者平均年龄为71±7岁,而未更换者为67±14岁。在这个小样本系列中,显著房室传导阻滞的发生率为17%。这明显高于其他近期报道的系列。该研究表明,AV文氏点高于120次/分钟并不能保证不会进展为房室传导阻滞。