Suppr超能文献

经食管程控心房起搏作为选择病态窦房结综合征患者进行永久性心房起搏的一种方法。

Transesophageal programmed atrial pacing as a method of selecting patients with sick sinus syndrome for permanent atrial pacing.

作者信息

Swiatecka G, Lubiński A, Raczak G, Stanke A, Juzwa A, Kubica J

机构信息

III Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Academy of Gdańsk, Poland.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1655-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06290.x.

Abstract

Many recent studies have shown transesophageal programmed atrial pacing (TP) as a very practical, safe and convenient way for assessment of sinus node function and AV conduction. On the other hand, permanent atrial pacing is known to be superior to ventricular pacing due to arrhythmogenic and hemodynamic reasons. This is the reason why we decided to use TP as a method of choosing patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) for permanent atrial pacing. Sixty-three patients with symptomatic (58) and asymptomatic (5) SSS in a variety of clinical situations were examined in this way. The following electrophysiological features were examined: sinus cycle length, sinus node recovery time as well as corrected time, secondary pause after overdrive stimulation, sinoatrial conduction time, Wenckebach point, induction of supraventricular arrhythmias by S1, S2, S3 programmed stimulation and burst pacing. Patients with abnormal parameters were examined once more after intravenous atropine 0.2 mg/kg to evaluate parasympathetic component. Standard 12-lead ECG was performed in all, and Holter monitoring in most of patients. Twenty-six patients were candidates for permanent AAI pacing. Failures occurred in eight patients usually due to low P wave amplitude and electrode instability. Eighteen patients received AAI pacing systems: eight with brady-tachycardia syndrome, nine with bradyarrhythmia and one with sinoatrial block. In the follow-up of 5-28 months in one patient occurred high degree AV block (II degree) during digitalis therapy. Reduction of doses made this block disappear. Examination of Wenckebach point and possibility of inducation of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in cases of atrial overexcitability are particularly useful in selecting patients for AAI pacing.

摘要

最近的许多研究表明,经食管程控心房起搏(TP)是评估窦房结功能和房室传导的一种非常实用、安全且便捷的方法。另一方面,由于致心律失常和血流动力学原因,永久性心房起搏已知优于心室起搏。这就是我们决定将TP作为选择病态窦房结综合征(SSS)患者进行永久性心房起搏的方法的原因。我们以这种方式检查了63例处于各种临床情况的有症状(58例)和无症状(5例)的SSS患者。检查了以下电生理特征:窦性周期长度、窦房结恢复时间以及校正时间、超速刺激后的继发性停顿、窦房传导时间、文氏点、S1、S2、S3程控刺激和猝发起搏诱发室上性心律失常。静脉注射0.2mg/kg阿托品后,对参数异常的患者再次进行检查,以评估副交感神经成分。所有患者均进行了标准12导联心电图检查,大多数患者进行了动态心电图监测。26例患者为永久性AAI起搏的候选者。8例患者出现失败,通常是由于P波振幅低和电极不稳定。18例患者接受了AAI起搏系统:8例患有慢快综合征,9例患有缓慢性心律失常,1例患有窦房阻滞。在1例患者5至28个月的随访中,在洋地黄治疗期间出现了高度房室传导阻滞(二度)。减少剂量后,这种阻滞消失。在选择AAI起搏患者时,检查文氏点以及心房过度兴奋时诱发室上性快速心律失常的可能性特别有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验