Volkmann H, Schnerch B, Kühnert H
Department of Internal Medicine, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, East Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2065-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06943.x.
In order to evaluate the diagnostic value of carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH) we have investigated 163 asymptomatic patients (88 male, 75 female, mean age 57.9 +/- 22.7 years) and 210 symptomatic patients (108 males, 102 females, mean age 61.1 +/- 28.1 years) with syncopes or dizziness. Thirty two of the 163 asymptomatic patients (20%) and 87 of the 210 symptomatic patients (41%) showed CSH (asystole greater than or equal to 3 sec during carotid sinus pressure). Male patients had a higher number of CSH than female (28% vs 10% in the asymptomatic group, 48% vs 34% in the symptomatic group). Electrophysiological investigations were performed in all 210 symptomatic patients. Normal electrophysiological results had 94 of the 210 patients. Thirty seven of these 94 patients showed CSH (39%). Prolonged sinus node recovery time (SNRT) and/or prolonged sinoatrial conduction time (SACT) were evaluated in 38 patients. Seventeen of the 38 patients had CSH (45%). Disorders of atrioventricular (AV) conduction were evaluated in 43 patients. Seventeen of the 43 patients showed CSH (40%). Thirty-five patients had both AV conduction disorders and prolonged SNRT or SACT. Sixteen of these 35 patients showed CSH (46%). In conclusion, no significant difference was found between patients with and without pathological electrophysiological results. The CSH is without value for predicting sinus node dysfunction and AV conduction disorder.
为评估颈动脉窦过敏(CSH)的诊断价值,我们对163例无症状患者(88例男性,75例女性,平均年龄57.9±22.7岁)和210例有晕厥或头晕症状的患者(108例男性,102例女性,平均年龄61.1±28.1岁)进行了研究。163例无症状患者中有32例(20%),210例有症状患者中有87例(41%)表现出CSH(颈动脉窦按压期间停搏≥3秒)。男性患者的CSH数量高于女性(无症状组为28%对10%,有症状组为48%对34%)。对所有210例有症状患者进行了电生理检查。210例患者中有94例电生理结果正常。这94例患者中有37例表现出CSH(39%)。对38例患者评估了窦房结恢复时间(SNRT)延长和/或窦房传导时间(SACT)延长。38例患者中有17例有CSH(45%)。对43例患者评估了房室(AV)传导障碍。43例患者中有17例表现出CSH(40%)。35例患者同时有AV传导障碍和SNRT或SACT延长。这35例患者中有16例表现出CSH(46%)。总之,电生理结果正常和异常的患者之间未发现显著差异。CSH对预测窦房结功能障碍和AV传导障碍无价值。